Amanda Knox and her Ex found guilty of the Murder of Medredith Kercher

Hardly the actions of a poor, scared, innocent, naive little girl as some people are trying to portray her as.

They are the exactly the actions of a poor, scared, innocent, naive little girl, just because she was innocent doesn't mean she would have been confident and competent, let alone with a corrupt police force trying to set her up, which looks like what has happened after reviewing the evidence.

There is a reason she has been let free after all!
 
He got fourteen years knocked off his sentence for implicating the other two. Why on earth would he want to say anything now? And what are the odds it would be the truth?

Well now the other two are deemed not guilty, surely his statement is invalid and needs further investigation?

As he is now the sole "killer" and that there was no other involved his sentenced must be reviewed, otherwise he has just committed murder and being given 16 years for it.
 
Well now the other two are deemed not guilty, surely his statement is invalid and needs further investigation?

As he is now the sole "killer" and that there was no other involved his sentenced must be reviewed, otherwise he has just committed murder and being given 16 years for it.

It should come as no surprise that the Italian system of law, just like their government, is completely incompetent, just look at the state of their Politics and Economy.
 
I can't believe people will still call her guilty of something because of flawed evidence and a feeling. The media have pretty much destroyed her life with all the awful headlines, and now people have formed such a strong opinion based on that they'll never see her as innocent. I can't believe people will still call her guilty of something because of such extremely flawed evidence and then retard gut feeling. The media have pretty much destroyed her life with all the awful headlines, and now people have formed such a strong opinion based on that they'll never see her as innocent.

Most of America considers her to have been wronged by nutjob Italian prosecutors. And the nutjob bit has been fairly persuasively established and the evidence has been proven conclusively to be a complete sham, hence her release.


What gets me even more are the people who seem to think that Knox is somehow gaining from all this, and that it's wrong for her to make any money. I mean, there's already a made for tv film which portrays her as the murderer. I think she has the right to release her own story.
 
Agreed. 4 years of false imprisonment - I hope they both make a fortune. It's not like they can just go back to normal and start a career right now.
 
Last edited:
Yes, for some reason the original sentence of 1 year for defamation was increased to 3 years while the 25 years for murder was expunged... how convenient.

And have you forgotten about Sollecito yet again? :rolleyes:
 
Yes, for some reason the original sentence of 1 year for defamation was increased to 3 years while the 25 years for murder was expunged... how convenient.

And have you forgotten about Sollecito yet again? :rolleyes:

Because she did slander? There are witnesses for that?

As for sollecito, from day 1 he was portrait as someone to be under the spell of Knox so he became nobody, even in his own summation he described himself 'Mr no one'.
 
Mignini needs to be sent down for abuse of position and permanently removed from office. Just read a blog from 2006 (before this murder) regarding what he put a journalist that he didn't like through. No wonder Knox caved during the interrogation.

Douglas Preston's real life thriller
(I received a chilling story today via email from author Douglas Preston, which I felt compelled to share with all of you. The following are his words. --DJM)

For the past five years, I have been working with an Italian journalist, Mario Spezi, on a book about the case of a serial killer known as the Monster of Florence, who murdered fourteen people in the hills of Florence from 1974 to 1985. The Monster has never been caught and the case is still open. It has become the longest-running and most expensive criminal investigation in modern Italian history. Our book, which will be published in Italian in Italy in April and later in America in English, faults the investigation and specifically criticizes the chief Examining Magistrate of Perugia, Giuliano Mignini, and the chief prosecutor, Michele Giuttari, who are in charge of one branch of the investigation.


I went to Italy on Feb. 14 with my family on vacation and to do some work with Spezi on the book. I was taken into custody by the police on Feb. 22. I was brought before Giuliano Mignini. There I was aggressively interrogated for three hours by him and three police detectives. I was asked about my relationship with Spezi and questioned in great detail about our journalistic activities, our theories, thoughts, and beliefs in the case. When I explained that my activities as an investigative journalist were privileged, Mignini shouted that this wasn't about freedom of the press, but was about a criminal matter of the "utmost seriousness," and that if I didn't answer the questions fully I would be arrested and charged with perjury. I was forced to answer the questions under the threat of arrest -- which I did.


Mignini then proceeded to play back telephone conversations I had had with Spezi, which they had wiretapped. He played the same passages again and again, demanding to know what we were "really" talking about, demanding that I explain the "real meaning" behind every casual word we had exchanged. They had also recorded conversations we had had in Spezi's car, which had been broken into and bugged -- Spezi found the bug yesterday. When I asked if I was being accused of a crime, Mignini said he believed I had committed not one but several serious felonies -- to whit: planting evidence to frame an innocent man, obstruction of justice, and being an accessory to murder -- all utterly false accusations.


Despite answering their questions fully and truthfully, in the end they charged me with "reticenza" and "false testimonianze" -- two serious crimes of perjury -- but said the charges would be suspended to allow me to leave Italy, to be reinstated later. In other words, it seems their goal was to get me out of Italy -- never to return.


The timing of this is not surprising. Our book will be published on April 19. The police had earlier obtained a draft of the book which they had seized in a search of Spezi's apartment, and so Mignini and Giuttari know well what we have written about him. This was a naked attempt to use the power of the state to intimidate and silence two journalists, and it may be a prelude to a legal action in Italy to block publication of the book.


After the interrogation, the police raided Spezi's apartment (for a third time -- he'd been raided twice before) and took away many documents. They also broke into Spezi's car and planted a microphone, which he later found. Following that, the police apparently leaked details of their investigation to the press, and articles in Corriere della Sera, La Nazione, and Il Giornale, about my interrogation and the search and seizure of Spezi's papers. The police also leaked out the information that Spezi was suspected of involvement in several murders and that he may be connected to the Satanic sect which the police believe was behind the Monster of Florence serial killings.


We desperately need to publicize this attack on journalistic freedom. I'm back in America and safe, but Spezi is at grave risk. His financial health, his career, and his very freedom, are at risk. Yesterday he wrote to me: "Io sono molto depresso, per avere fatto il nostro dovere, mi ritrovo in questa situazione." ("It is very depressing that, for having done my duty as a journalist, I find myself in this situation.")


Please -- something must be done as soon as possible. Anyone wishing more information about the case may contact me at [email protected].


Some background on myself -- I'm a journalist who writes for the New Yorker magazine, and I've published fourteen books and won numerous awards. I'm on the board of the Author's Guild. I mention these details only to establish my credentials. In my entire journalistic career I have not experienced the kind of abuse of prosecutorial power as I witnessed in Italy.
(from http://www.crimefictionblog.com/2006/03/douglas_preston.html)
 
The slander is a product of the situation she was put in. Due to incompetence or more like corruption. She's served her time and I hope she makes million, because her life has been destroyed and she will never get those years back.
 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oct/04/knox-acquittal-only-possible-verdict

Crucial evidence that could have exonerated them was lost or mishandled. For example, the hard drive on Sollecito's computer, which could have shown he was on his computer during the time of the murder, was "fried'' by investigators as they supposedly tried to copy it.

Something else I didn't know - Sollecito's hard drive data was lost! A genuine mistake by the police or more corruption? I wonder...
 
Yes, for some reason the original sentence of 1 year for defamation was increased to 3 years while the 25 years for murder was expunged... how convenient.

The murder conviction could have also increased to life - that was a risk of the the appeal.

You realise that it isn't that uncommon for judges to simply award time served...
 
This sort of thing terrifys me. The posts in this thread and this whole case.

You cant trust people the state or anything. They will presume your guilt, when all evidence is to the contrary.

Nothing to hide nothing to fear eh.
 
Back
Top Bottom