Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
krooton said:Question.
Does anyone know how much a cpu actually costs the manufacture?
Being top dog obviously artificially inflates prices, as with most components, but does a top end C2D actually cost anything more to make than the bottom of the range?
Digital Punk said:There's absolutely no ass kicking whatsoever.![]()
In my testing, games are a few fps faster, and encoding video has been a couple of minutes better, but no more than that.
I've been thoroughly underwhelmed with my C2D tbh.
It hasn't lived up to the hype in my book.
Edinho said:Talking against the establishment will get you hung I tell ya. Im like you I dont fall for this omglolzzzwtf11111111!!!! Core2Duo pwnzzzzzz crap. Yes its good but you would think that the way some people talk it was the new dawn in computing.
Irrespective of the fact if you say "I'm NOT looking at overclocking" the C2D peeps will push "aah but C2D is muuuuuch faster when overclocked to 3.2GHz".Justintime said:Heh totally agreed, its like some revolution and computers are now sentinent the way some peeps harp on![]()
riddlermarc said:Irrespective of the fact if you say "I'm NOT looking at overclocking" the C2D peeps will push "aah but C2D is muuuuuch faster when overclocked to 3.2GHz".
I don't overclock my test/dev machines, I need them stable and as (relatively) cheap as possible - hence X2 and quad-core AM2 when they come![]()
helmutcheese said:You dont see it ?, the CPU is no longer at stock MHZ, be it by the FSB or Multi, there is no guarantee any CPU will be stable at any OC, thats for the user to test out.
Reading that link makes it sound like AMD are going to restart making s939 chips? Is that right?mikezero said: