• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**AMD Fiji Thread**

900x900px_LL_83de3750_batman_full.png

900x900px_LL_c3033d5e_dyeinglight_full.png

900x900px_LL_eeeb5548_witcher.png


3DMark 11. OC @ 1140Mhz (Voltage should improve clock?)

P19300

11poc.jpg

Compared with my Titan X.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/9867137

MnP3REb.png
 
Last edited:
I think it looks ok so far.

The stock Fury X beats the stock 980 Ti and Titan X in Arkham Origins, and also stock Fury X beats stock 980 Ti in Witcher 3. I did not expect that tbh.

Once we get to see proper over clocking on these, they might actually be quite far ahead.
 
Same, I would wait for those proper benchmarks. It's a good buy for me if it is cooler, quieter and performs anywhere near that of a GTX980Ti. I guess we will see in the next few days when those reviews comes out of the floodgate.
 
humbug:

for me its that 3DMark11 score that throws the whole thing into question, Boom, @ 1140Mhz its 5% faster than a 1250Mhz 290X. Christ i could get close with a 290P

That makes no sense.
Click to expand...

Yeah I'm not worried about that. To get my score my Titan X was clock at over 1400mhz. So that 3d Mark 11 score may well be legit.

Fury X overclocking will probably take some time before we get big OC numbers.
 
Its one game Boom, we Know AMD are quite a bit faster in GTAV, and yet Fury-X only just has the 980TI, why is it so incredibly slow in 3DMark11?

Those slides look bad.

Edit, can't quote in this thread, the 290X clock for clock is 10% slower in 3DMar11, that is shocking.
 
humbug:

Its one game Boom, we Know AMD are quite a bit faster in GTAV, and yet Fury-X only just has the 980TI, why is it so incredibly slow in 3DMark11?

Those slides look bad.

Edit, can't quote in this thread, the 290X clock for clock is 10% slower in 3DMar11, that is shocking.
Click to expand...

What's one game?

Fury X is ahead in, Arkham Origins, Witcher 3, Far Cry 4, GTAV (1080P) behind at 4K.

Looking pretty good so far. Overclocking Fury X is totally new. So that could change big time over next few weeks.

At stock Fury X looks like a beast against 980 Ti / Titan X, trades blows, loses some wins others. Same price as 980 Ti (Air Coolers) but with AIO. I would say it's looking pretty good.
 
Look at Crysis 3, 290X 1000Mhz 44FPS, Fury-X @ 1050Mhz 52FPS (+15% normalized)

10% faster in 3DMark11

Its about 40% faster than the 290X in Whatchdogs which is what you would expect.

The numbers are all over the place, half the time the performance is not dissimilar to a 290X.

If this is true its really not good at all.
 
Last edited:
If those numbers are legit then that's not bad at all, Not going to rush out and and get one though, I'll stay with my Titan X BUT if this is a taste of things to come in this price range with such a good card then next years GPU's are going to be sexy as hell :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom