Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
One of the most attractive things about FreeSync when compared to G-Sync is that FreeSync is free to all our partners," AMD’s gaming scientist Richard Huddy told PCR.
"That is to say the partner never has to pay us anything for using the IP which we gave to VESA – the standard authority on this kind of matter.
G-Sync monitors will cost about an extra $80 to 100 for consumers compared to FreeSync.
Because FreeSync is completely free on licence, any G-Sync monitor can have FreeSync built into it as well. It’s possible the early G-Sync monitors won’t support FreeSync because FreeSync is a fairly new standard, but by some time very early next year when the first few FreeSync monitors come out, my guess is that G-Sync monitors will also support FreeSync," Huddy added.
Certainly we put down no restriction – we don’t try and discourage anyone from putting G-Sync into a monitor if they put FreeSync in, they can freely choose to do so, but I’m not sure why they would add $80-100 to the bill of materials, given that FreeSync solves the same problem as G-Sync does. It gets rid of all tearing, it gives you a proper dynamic refresh rate that matches the gaming experience.
Keep it in the Free sync thread. already posted.
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=26822624&postcount=957
Nice, so amd words cheaper than Gsync, better performance than Gsync.
Could be onto a winner.
According to AMD.... aka PR tripe as usual. Don't believe everything you read on the internet mate
This is why so much existing AMD hardware is FreeSync capable -
We already know how good a monitors free sync is will depend on how much your willing to pay for your monitor anyway. Huddy said in the PC per interview that cheaper monitors that support it will probably only have a 20 or 30 frame variance that it will need to be kept within in order for it to work. How often does that happen?
Note where I say amd words don't mean I believe it, can't believe something till I see proof to back it up.
???
Am I missing something here, Isn't it only the 260 and 290 ranges that can do it? So more than half of this gen doesn't do it and nothing from the previous gen's does it.
The AMD Radeon™ R9 295X2, 290X, R9 290, R7 260X and R7 260 GPUs additionally feature updated display controllers that will support dynamic refresh rates during gaming.
Yea but the Gsync monitors comes with a price premium, so essentially people would have to spend extra money to use the feature anyway, even if their cards "support" Gsync...While GSync is supported by almost every mid-range or better Nvidia GPU that came out over the last two and half years (GTX660/650Ti and up)
Nobody can say for sure until we see some solid pricing on the Freesync monitor. But for Gsync, the AOC practically same 1920 monitor with and without Gsync have something like £180-£200 price difference...people can get a 2nd hand 290 with that kind of money.Wonder which will be more, GSync monitor with its premium or a Freesync monitor plus a new AMD graphics card that supports Freesync?