Caporegime
It's not Tri-Channel, that's for sure.
They could have made done quad, but as we can see some FM2+ boards already, it's dual channel.
They could have made done quad, but as we can see some FM2+ boards already, it's dual channel.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
DM
why don't AMD use UMC anymore? their portfolio shows they are on 28nm gate last High K? is it because of the UMC-IBM deal for 20nm and 14nm FinFET? and am I mistaken that UMC and AMD had a deal about 10 years ago for UMC`s Fab 12A (300mm)?
It's not Tri-Channel, that's for sure.
They could have made done quad, but as we can see some FM2+ boards already, it's dual channel.
...
Technically it's impressive, in game usage, woeful. Can't stand motion blur nor DOF because they can't mimic real life, because in real life you can choose where these occur, when a game forces it on you, it's just wrong.
your thoughts re UMC as above?
On the DDR4/iGP issue; it won't help much
Bandwidth is the problem and a boost from, say, 2133Mhz DDR3 to 2400Mhz DDR4 doesn't add much. Certainly it doesn't get you past the bottleneck with kaveri's rumoured IGP spec.
It helps, but it isn't a silver bullet.
An on-die setup, or GDDR5 or similar is needed to get over the hump.
You can get 3000MHZ DDR3.
Even at 4000mhz, you only get to a theoretical 64GB/s, which is behind a 7750 and 7770. Unless DDR4 comes in at 128bit bus width, which I've not seen suggested, it will still put the brakes on IGP performance.
Even at 4000mhz, you only get to a theoretical 64GB/s, which is behind a 7750 and 7770. Unless DDR4 comes in at 128bit bus width, which I've not seen suggested, it will still put the brakes on IGP performance.