Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The September figure has to be taken in the context that an Intel CPU launch is imminent and many potential Intel buyers will be waiting to spend then. What will be interesting is to see what the Oct/Nov/Dec charts look and if AMD still maintains their lead.
... and with all those things in the 2600's favour the 8700K's numbers have been consistently good even in this last month. You have to be really blinkered if you can not see how that a new Intel CPU launch in October might adversely affect sales in September.
There are even threads in the CPU section with potential buyers of 8700K's been told to wait so why would you just put it all down to AMD's superiority? I love what AMD are doing but I also know how to read a chart and apply it to the context of it's relevant space.
How does your mate with threadripper fare fps wise?
I keep looking at it given the prices.
I'm not sure why you quoted me as what you just wrote has little to do with what I wrote. Just to recap: You were having a go at me for suggesting that the 8700k's slightly lower sales in September over August might be in part due not only to the 2600's resurgence but also that a new Intel CPU is due in October.
My reply was purely reinforcing the sensible and impartial notion that sales of a brand of CPU might dip the month before a refresh CPU launch (same for AMD as well).
You're reply, while perfectly anecdotal and I'm in total agreement with is what we refer to as non sequitur.
You might as well have talked about how good the Barton CPU's were (forgive the slight hyperbole but you should get my point)
Look at the chart again, removing your AMD tinted glasses, and rather than just looking at the 2600's meteoric rise, look at the 8700k's numbers; even with the swing to AMD in terms of percentage of total CPU sales, the 8700K sales since May 2018 have steadily increased each month till August and then have taken a slight dip in September, one month before their new CPU launch.
While I'm in total agreement with you and your mates as to Intel practices and short changing us customers, the sales numbers in the last chart should help give some indication as to the consensus view outside of these forums.
Even though AMD have said themselves that Zen 2 is aimed at Ice Lake, i really can't see them surpassing Intel in gaming performance, but we'll see.
Since the Intel price hikes, one of Germany's largest online retailers are selling 70% more Ryzen sales over the last few days compared to Intel.
In other words, at least seven out of 10 buyers have opted for a Ryzen chip >> https://digiworthy.com/2018/09/29/amd-ryzen-sales-intel-prices/
AMD (AMD -3.4%) is heading in the opposite direction possibly because of yesterday’s launch of Google’s Project Stream in-browser gaming test program. But the company also had an analyst downgrade yesterday and dropped last Friday as rival Intel updated its 10nm chip supply.
We shall see... think it might be slightly optimistic or naive to think AMD will ride this high forever.
After returning to profitability in 2017, AMD has continued gaining momentum to perform better in 2018, with its share price hitting a 12-year high recently and its global desktop processor market share likely to rebound to 30% again in the fourth quarter of the year, thanks to full foundry support from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) and Intel's delay in launching 10nm processors, according to industry sources
The sources said that AMD has drastically changed its foundry strategy, loosening ties with Globalfoundries and contracting TSMC to fabricate its GPUs, server and PC processors on 7nm process. The policy change has sent AMD share prices rallying all the way since mid-2018 amid market expectations for better chip yield rates and performances as well as normal shipments to customers.
In addition, Intel's failure to carry out process transition from 14nm to 10nm in the second half of 2018 and the ensuing supply shortfall have prompted PC vendors to adopt AMD processors, further pushing up AMD's share prices to new highs in 12 years since late August.
Desktop and motherboard vendors including Asustek Computer, Micro-Star International (MSI), Gigabyte Technology and ASRock have ramped up production and shipments of devices fitted with AMD processors, driving up the chipmaker's share of the desktop processor market to over 20% in the third quarter. The company is very likely to see the figure further rebound to the level of 30% again.
In terms of server processor market, AMD's EPYC 7000 series processors have been well adopted by Mellanox and Samsung Electronics since their launch in June 2017, and the firm's expanded EPYC series have also won robust support from heavyweight clients including Microsoft, Baidu, Dell, HP and Supermicro, as well as Taiwan's Inventec, Wistron, Asustek, and Gigabyte. It is expected that the EPYC series sever processors will help AMD win a 5% share of the global x86 server platform market by the end of 2018, which has been 99% controlled by Intel.
AMD's latest EPYC processor, codenamed Rome and adopting Zen2 architecture, is slated for volume production in 2019 using 7nm process at TSMC after the delivery of samplings by the end of 2018.
With 8 business days still left, AMD is already set for another record breaking month at Mindfactory!
Sales of AMD's 2700X has exploded while the 2600 remains the biggest seller for a second month in row!
Intel's previous top seller, the 8700K continues to fall while the 8068k sees a small sale increase this month.
Hope you bought the AMD shares now they are low...
https://semiaccurate.com/2018/10/22/intel-kills-off-the-10nm-process/
Intel must have a plan B, they probably have a new architecture ready to lay out on 12nm.or some such or they could go down the AMD route and stitch together a few of their 4c/8t high perf chips ala Ryzen and play AMD at their own game?
How long till AMD start cranking prices and turning the thumb screws just as Nvidia and Intel have done over the years of dominance.
It may or may not be naive but I genuinely believe that AMD have a better business "ethos" than Nvidia or Intel. Maybe it just comes from having their hand forced as the underdog for the past while. But I don't know. I just believe a lot of the staff, company and Directors just "play fair" more than green and blue. (Open source this and that being a good example). I certainly trust Lisa as a person a lot more than Jensen and whomever Intel have as *CEO *insert current CEO at given time here. Dunno. I just much prefer them as a company. They seem plucky and genuinely don't want to rip their customers off. I've met a few AMD staff over the years and they seem to really really believe in the company and are passionate about their customers. Intel is just uber corporate and Nvidia uber greedy.
Just topped up a bit more of their shares. Missed the drop below $20, but oh well. Though kinda disappointed with AMDs inability to convert Intels shortages into their own benefit