• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD on the road to recovery.

Permabanned
Joined
2 Sep 2017
Posts
10,490
Intel can't have 100 Billion Dollars debt :cry:

It is actually *only* 35 Billion Dollars.

How Much Debt Does Intel Carry?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Intel had US$35.4b of debt in March 2021, down from US$39.9b, one year before. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$22.4b, its net debt is less, at about US$13.0b.
Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly - Simply Wall St News

 
Caporegime
OP
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
47,568
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
Intel can't have 100 Billion Dollars debt :cry:

It is actually *only* 35 Billion Dollars.

How Much Debt Does Intel Carry?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Intel had US$35.4b of debt in March 2021, down from US$39.9b, one year before. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$22.4b, its net debt is less, at about US$13.0b.
Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly - Simply Wall St News


That completely ignores long term debt, its the credit card but not the mortgage,

You're sort of right tho i should have checked my figures..

Intel's long term debt is just shy of $70 Billion, with Shareholders equity of $85 Billion, the later is how much of Intel's assets shareholder own.

https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/INTC/intel/debt-equity-ratio
 
Caporegime
OP
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
47,568
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
Notice how she never mentions the competition, is very humble about herself, her company and its products, doesn't give anything away about what her plans are.

Contrast that with a typical Intel in public who do nothing but snark at their competitors, congratulate themselves like deluded narcissist, and overhype their roadmaps.

One is comfortable and confident, the other is not.

 
Permabanned
Joined
2 Sep 2017
Posts
10,490
Notice how she never mentions the competition, is very humble about herself, her company and its products, doesn't give anything away about what her plans are.

Contrast that with a typical Intel in public who do nothing but snark at their competitors, congratulate themselves like deluded narcissist, and overhype their roadmaps.

One is comfortable and confident, the other is not.

Well, I would call it elementary psychology. Don't know if it is right or false but AMD has been the underdog both towards the competitors in the CPU and the GPU markets.
Also, there is ARM out there, which is also a threat.

AMD simply can not afford to be bullish about something that is in a superior position compared to it.

Maybe AMD would change some day when it becomes the number 1 choice in all of the markets it competes in.
 
Soldato
Joined
1 Jun 2013
Posts
9,315
It's certainly a great turnaround by the underdog. AMD brought itself back from the brink of bankruptcy by totally changing themselves. The divested themselves of the underperforming and expensive fabs, got access to ATIs technology and the graphics/AI/machine learning market, the big console contracts (because of their combined CPU and graphics IP). They produced great products through engineering and innovation.

Intel however have become moribund, a marketing and sales led company eking out incremental improvements to maximise profits, with seemingly little interest in moving the industry forwards with innovation. Despite having their own fabs, they can't get to 10/7 nm, and have resorted to marketing FUD and rebadging the same thing over and over.
 
Soldato
Joined
24 Feb 2003
Posts
4,198
Location
Stourport-On-Severn
Well, I would call it elementary psychology. Don't know if it is right or false but AMD has been the underdog both towards the competitors in the CPU and the GPU markets.
Also, there is ARM out there, which is also a threat.

AMD simply can not afford to be bullish about something that is in a superior position compared to it.

Maybe AMD would change some day when it becomes the number 1 choice in all of the markets it competes in.

Or, it could simply be a woman that is actually genuine in her thoughts and what she says. Let's face, she has delivered on AMD's roadmap since she became CEO.............the same can't be said for any Intel CEO over the last 10 years or so.
It was also plainly obvious to me in that interview that even though she didn't say it, AMD fully intends to be bigger than Intel.
 
Associate
Joined
26 May 2017
Posts
360
Notice how she never mentions the competition, is very humble about herself, her company and its products, doesn't give anything away about what her plans are.

Contrast that with a typical Intel in public who do nothing but snark at their competitors, congratulate themselves like deluded narcissist, and overhype their roadmaps.

One is comfortable and confident, the other is not.

Zen
 
Caporegime
OP
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
47,568
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
oh that's right AMD hit $122 today, market cap of $145 Billion.

aShUSVL.png

A strong outlook for 2022.

Tying It All Up
Based on how the quarter has proceeded, it is exceedingly likely that AMD will ship $300M-$400M incremental EPYC revenues in enterprise and datacenter, $100M to $200M incremental revenues in GPUs, and about $50M incremental console sales between the new Steam Deck console, and existing PS5 and Xbox consoles. In other words, AMD could potentially ship between $450M to $650M in incremental revenues compared to Q2.

On a $3.85B Q2 baseline, this suggests revenue potential between $4.3B to $4.5B in revenues as opposed to $4.1B in guidance. As such, it is possible that AMD had much more demand, and ship more, especially on the data center CPU and client GPU fronts. The challenge for AMD is not product demand but if AMD has the supply to meet the demand.

A nice revenue beat is only half the story. The other half of the story is gross margins. Keen readers may have noticed that much of the incremental Q3 revenue discussed above comes with juicy margins. AMD’s margins on EPYC and MI200 GPU are much higher than the corporate average. Thanks to insatiable crypto demand and elevated GPU prices, GPU margins are also likely to be healthy. Considering the mix involved, Q3 gross margin is likely to be at least 100 basis points above guidance.

Guidance For 2022 And Beyond
As strong as Q3 likely was, AMD’s strong product offerings for servers, clients, and consoles mean that AMD is likely to continue to grow rapidly – especially in the data center where its products are most advantaged. This will drive strong revenues and strengthen margins for the foreseeable future. Note also that the Xilinx (NASDAQ:XLNX) acquisition is expected to close before the end of the year and all future estimates will have to include Xilinx contributions. And Xilinx’s average margins are much higher than AMD’s and could push up AMD’s combined gross margin by a few hundred basis points. Thanks to organic margin growth and a kicker from Xilinx, AMD should comfortably deliver 50%+ gross margins in 2022. As such, in 2022, it is highly likely that AMD’s gross margins will surpass Intel’s gross margins. If Xilinx acquisition closes before the end of the month, it is possible that AMD’s gross margin could cross Intel’s gross margin in Q4 itself.

In summary, AMD is set to deliver a strong beat and raise. AMD is in a period of explosive revenue and gross margin growth, and the Company’s valuation should continue to expand meaningfully going forward.

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4461703-amd-q3-earnings-beat-and-raise-ahead
 
Soldato
Joined
15 Oct 2019
Posts
11,687
Location
Uk
In summary, AMD is set to deliver a strong beat and raise. AMD is in a period of explosive revenue and gross margin growth, and the Company’s valuation should continue to expand meaningfully going forward.
Yeah it's been a great year for AMD although not so much for the consumer who has had to pay for these gains.
 
Associate
Joined
26 May 2017
Posts
360
Yeah it's been a great year for AMD although not so much for the consumer who has had to pay for these gains.
IMHO a lot cheaper than if Intel had held the reigns. (16 core Intel desktop anyone). And as for the DC / HEDT say no more. AMD CPU / AMD dual chiplet GPU / Xilinx Edge device - imagine the Intel price.
 
Soldato
Joined
15 Oct 2019
Posts
11,687
Location
Uk
IMHO a lot cheaper than if Intel had held the reigns. (16 core Intel desktop anyone). And as for the DC / HEDT say no more. AMD CPU / AMD dual chiplet GPU / Xilinx Edge device - imagine the Intel price.
You say that but I don't ever remember Intel bringing out a new generation of desktop CPUs where the cheapest one to buy was nearly £300.
 
Associate
Joined
26 May 2017
Posts
360
You say that but I don't ever remember Intel bringing out a new generation of desktop CPUs where the cheapest one to buy was nearly £300.
lol - you get what you pay for. there are plenty of options if you don't want (can't afford) the best. AMD's profit margin is still way below that of Nvidia or Intel.
 
Associate
Joined
14 Nov 2005
Posts
1,542
You say that but I don't ever remember Intel bringing out a new generation of desktop CPUs where the cheapest one to buy was nearly £300.
They simply done what Apple have been doing for years, for the budget user they left the previous generation on the shelves at a reduced price
 
Back
Top Bottom