How did that work out for AMD up against Nvidia in the 290/390/Fury generation of products?
290/390/Fury are high end not mid/low.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
How did that work out for AMD up against Nvidia in the 290/390/Fury generation of products?
The main win for AMD having Mantle in Vulkan should be that they should perform well in games using it. AMD with open GL were behind Nvidia. So now AMD should be strong on all gaming Api's like Nvidia are, assuming people start using Vulkan instead of Open GL.
AMD had poor OpenGL performance because they never put the effort in to drivers. I don't see why they will suddenly change their operating mode for the last 20 years. The first indications are already nvidia is ahead on drivers and developer resources.
290/390/Fury are high end not mid/low.
290 and fury were both high end cards, nor sure what you are asking?
I think maybe AMD are going for the low-mid sector with volume sales(Polaris). While it may not be good for people in the high end market it is where the money is.
If they could shift a lot of units in the low to mid markets it would bring the revenue in and enable them to start fighting in the high end(Vega), plus it would claw market share back. Of course this is all my own opinion and maybe miles off the mark![]()
Lol @ people expecting AMD to beat the 1070 on price and performance, it's not going to happen, they won't be releasing a 980ti beater that's £280, just is not going to happen, I expect their card that bears the 980ti to be around £400 and still be worse than the 1080, and not arrive til 2017
I hate the fact I'm going to have to buy an Nvidia card and a gsync monitor as my only alternative will be to give up pc gaming at the high end.
I'm an ideal world AMD deliver a truly earthshattering card that is not only priced well but delivers on all fronts, performance, power draw and low heat.
Unfortunately I look at past launches like the 290, 390 and the Fiji stuff and think that people in charge of the critical decisions at AMD don't know their butts from their elbows
The 970 was by far the greats selling card of recent times, and nvidia has very definitely gone for the same approach this time round. Don't underestimate the sales of the 1070 compared to the lower end. And then there is the fact that profit margins are higher the higher up the stack you go. The low end is not what is used to be because iGPU has taken a huge chunk of the low end away.
I see no reason why Polaris will not match 980Ti/Fury X speeds or within a few perfcent for a similar or even lower price to 1070. The fact Nvidia are leaving a ~£180 gap between 1070 and 1080 prices IMHO either indicates 1070 is not that good (relative to 1080), or more likely they expect Polaris to match them in price/perf at that level.
P10 is allegedly up to around 2560 Shaders which is similar to R9 390. So If Polaris is aiming for ~R9 390/X replacements then with architectural improvements, core clock enhancements and other improvements they should give a ~25% - 30%+ performance improvement over R9 390. That would bring them right up around 980Ti/Fury X speeds or even slightly higher. This is all on a chip with a 40% reduced die size than 1070. Now add in the DX12 improvements and for DX12 games they could well easily exceed 980Ti and Fury X speeds.
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Sapphire/R9_390_Nitro/23.html
Don't make assumptions that AMD are out of the game just yet when it comes to matching or beating 1070 on price/perf.
Let's wait and see. AMD have 2-3 weeks before Pascal is released, so hopefully they can put some actual tangible news out before then.
So your expecting a chip that is considerably smaller, uses considerably less power, has a bus half the size, than the 390/X to perform half as fast again.
As that is what it will need to do to match a 1070. ( the TitanX is about one and half times faster than a 970/980 ergo 390/X and we were told the 1070 beats the TitanX)
The new node shrink has shown to offer good performance, as seen by the NVidia launch, but I think you are asking a just a bit too much.
AMD's P10 core will massively outsell anything in recent history. GP104 certainly won't.
The P10 has already been demoed running Hitman at 60fps @1440P. That is 980ti/Fury X levels and since the demo was locked at 60fps we don't know how much more headroom there is on top of that. From benchmarks the TitanX gets about about 60fps max.
For reference here is a comparison between a 390 and 970 running the same game at 1080P. You can see that both cards don't hold 60fps even at 1080P unlike the P10 demo @ 1440P which suggests the P10 is more powerful than a TitanX is this game at least.
The P10 has already been demoed running Hitman at 60fps @1440P.
I see the value of 980's dropping to around the 200 mark, and the 970 around the 160 mark shortly, should the 1070 be £300. The 980ti won't be worth more then £280. This puts AMD in a really tight spot. I wonder what price point they'll come in at
You have no idea what settings were used so it is fairly irrelevant.
We have see leaked benchmarks that put big Polaris between 390 and 390x performance, that makes sense given the ship size and power and ties in with AMD's information about mainstream and low-end parts. We will see soon enough.
I'm not saying Polaris chips are bad or will be a failure. My opinion is simply they are aiming for a lower-end market so therefor,Anne will obviously not be there to compete with nvidia mid-high end. AMD needed more power efficient smaller low end chips but they also need some performance cards.
It turned out that wasn't maxed.
source?
It turned out that wasn't maxed.