• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Polaris architecture – GCN 4.0

AMD Polaris 10 & 11 400 Series Specs & Performance Leaked

AMD’s Polaris 10 to deliver R9 390X/390 horsepower at half the wattage for less than $299. Polaris 11 to be AMD’s console killer GPU, delivering GeForce GTX 950 performance at only 50W. This is only the tip of the iceberg according to the latest leaks that have hit the web from multiple sources, so buckle up as we break AMD’s Radeon 400 series down for you.

AMD Polaris 10 Features 32 CUs & 5.5 TFLOPS
To Deliver R9 390X/390 Performance At Half The Wattage & Less Than $299


AMD’s Polaris 10 GPU reportedly features a 256bit GDDR5/X memory interface & cards based on the chip will feature 8GB of memory. The GPU packs 32 GCN 4.0 compute units for a total of 2048 stream processors, the same number found in AMD’s current R9 380X. However, Polaris 10 cards are reportedly significantly faster and will deliver R9 390X/390 class performance. Leaks also pit the MSRP at less than $299 at launch.

According to today’s leak the GPU is rated at 5.5 TFLOPS, which is 0.1 TFLOPS shy of the 2816 SP R9 290X. An impressive feat considering the 290X is a ~290W card with 37.5% more GCN stream processors and a memory interface that’s twice as wide. The card is also reportedly rated at less than 150W. According to a previous leak from Benchlife Polaris 10 graphics cards will be rated at around 110W-135W depending on the GPU configuration and clock speeds. Interestingly, according to VCZ this 5.5 TFLOP GPU is not even a desktop class chip but a mobility variant. This would bring R9 390X/390 class performance to notebooks.



http://wccftech.com/amd-r9-480x-470x-specs-allegedly-revealed/
 
Last edited:

The billion jiggawatt face melting super white giant brightness of Polaris will open a rift in space and time, delivering 2012 mid-range levels of performance today!

Flopper was right!

Who will buy a 1070 now? Dead in the water. Poor nVidia.
 
The Fury X, was supposed to be a Titan X killer, but it didn't even beat out the 980.

So you are saying a FuryX slower than a 980? Maybe warly drivers were not up to scratch but the FuryX is near the top in most of the new games from what I've seen. Even a 290X is beating the 980 in some games now.
 
The Fury X, was supposed to be a Titan X killer, but it didn't even beat out the 980.

Titan killer performance was based on some pic which was later proved to be fake (the pic said hunting titans or something like that), so nope, it wasn't meant to be a Titan x killer.
 
So you are saying a FuryX slower than a 980? Maybe warly drivers were not up to scratch but the FuryX is near the top in most of the new games from what I've seen. Even a 290X is beating the 980 in some games now.

When it was released, it was trading blows with the 980, was winning some, losing some, was a massive letdown after all that hype.
 
Back
Top Bottom