• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Radeon R9 290X with Hawaii GPU pictured, has 512-bit 4GB Memory

If those benches are accurate, everything will now depend on the price.

I don't think they will be too far off, especially when you consider these results which show something similar.


9wxsdVa.jpg


The elephant in the room would be the Chinese benches which have it as a draw, maybe the smallest advantage to the 290X. The problem with those is the 40% fan profile and 95c temps. Throttling could well be occurring on those which is going to affect benchmark scores. A look at a stock 7950 boosts benchmark scores will tell you that.
 
Seems odd considering it was the other way around for the 670/680 and 7950/7970. The 7000 series's better specs made it shine in synthetics but things were more even in games.

Gpu boost working its magic no doubt.

Also possible the 290X was benched on 13.10. 13.11 (290X driver) offers gains on synthetic scores.

3dmark 2011 still favours Nvidia cards. Firestrike more to AMD. Heaven and Valley maybe a slight favour to the AMD cards mentioned because they're simply faster than their Nvidia counter parts.
 
Like someone else said, but whether it's faster or slower it all depends on price, if the 290X is -5% ~ +5% of the Titan but cost £350 it would be a huge hit, it it is 10% faster than Titan but cost £550 I think it wouldn't be as much of a hit as still priced out of the reach of the majority of gamers.

Look forward to some English reviews and pricing.

Lol titan beating performance at £350? What planet are you living on. If it beats titan performance all AMD need to do is price it slightly higher than a 780 and that's fair enough. If the 290X beats the titan i bet the 290 will beat the 780 and then they can price that slightly cheaper than the 780.
 
Ah I was meant to write -5% ~ -15% slower than Titan. Tired, long day lol.

Yeah I think a tad slower card priced nicely would be more popular than a card that's a tad faster and costing around £550.

See to most people if a card is priced at £550 it might as well be £1000, because it is just out their reach, whereas £300+ is more attainable.

If you want titan beating performance at £300-£350 you need two AMD 7950's. Otherwise you can buy a 770 for the same price.
 
That hitler video was great btw. Props to whoever did it. The part about Broomstick and 60fps at all times raised a smile. :D

I might have to do one of those. :D
 
Last edited:
i wonder if roy is driving the truck :)

The phrase keep on truckin and AMD Roy go well together i think.

Ah ok, well I'll take it as a compliment if I'm mentioned :D.

Its all good. ;)

Regarding your video though. Pretty sure the 7970 was a reference blower when it was first launched so its standard for AMD to do this. It would also reach 90c+ if you ran it at stock clocks with only 40% fan speed. 4-6 weeks till non reference 290X cards come out according to Gibbo.

I'm guessing this is to compare cards of a similar value.

Makes sense to me.
 
It's all in jest, 90c+ isn't exactly new territory for modern GPUs :) We don't even know how loud these cards are yet.

They'll be loud as they're identical to 7970 reference of which i owned one but at such low fan speed cooling performance will be poor. I could tolerate mine up to 60% or so. I'd imagine that would be good for 80c or lower on the 290x at stock.
 
Interesting that AMD had the balls to challenge a 780 on Bioshock Infinte with DDOF enabled. This is a setting (DDOF) that notoriously favours Nvidia cards. It offers zero image quality benefit but does hurt both sides fps considerably. Sadly most review sites bench it. Let me tell you, default Ultra preset is better and this setting favours AMD cards strongly.


Typo i think Tommy. Otherwise the two graphs he just posted contradict everything he says. :D
 
@techreport


The numbers show the R9 290X beating the GTX 780 in two games, BioShock Infinite and Tomb Raider, at a 3840x2160 resolution. In case you're wondering, that's the resolution of Asus' PQ321Q, one of the first desktop 4K monitors on the market. Here's everything AMD is making public at this juncture:

BioShock Infinite
Setting: 3840x2160 systemspec=ultra

AMD Radeon R9 290X "Quiet Mode" average frame rate: 44.25
NVIDIA GTX 780 average frame rate: 37.67

Tomb Raider Setting: 3840x2160 16xAF Tressfx=off aatype=fxaa texturequality=ultra shadowmode=on shadowresolution=high
ssaomode=ultra dofquality=ultra reflectionquality=high lod=ultra postprocess=on highprecisionrt=on tessellation=on

AMD Radeon R9 290X "Quiet Mode" average frame rate: 40.2
NVIDIA GTX 780 average frame rate: 34.5

Why would they disable TressFX and enable DDOF? Me thinks AMD are going easy on the 780 here.
 
Back
Top Bottom