Soldato
1070 is 16nm.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I have an old Asus M5A97 R2.0. (with an AMD 8350, Corsair CX600). Now ill be honest i dont understand the reddit thread in full. All i see is may damage components.
This all seems a bit up in the air at the moment, my msi rx480 arrives today. Do i open it and install it risking my other components or do i just send it back and wait for a 1060?
I know the chance is small, but if something does happen then who covers the damage? msi? amd? i really cant be bothered with the hassle.
The problem is with comparing the 480 8GB, not the 480 4GB to the 970 4GB (3.5GB+500MB).
The RX480 4GB is £180, and would probably have been around £160 is not due to the current greatly weaken pound.
The card replace the 960/380 at same/similar launch price, and offer a respective 70%/60% increase in performance...yet people can somehow turn this like a huge negative PR.
Something is seriously wrong with the RX480 is getting far more sticks than the 1080 that's offering around similar level of performance increase comparing to the 980 (70%) but at around 40-50% higher launch price!
480 confirmed can crash on certain mobos.
In multiple DX12 games it absolute thrashes a 970. The card is NOT noisey, the majority of reviews called it silent or quiet and not irritating. IF you whack up the fan to 100% and the fan limit to max then the noise gets bad, but you have exactly no reason to do this. It's a reference model for what should be a sub £200 card(without brexit), making it considerably cooler requires a more expensive heatsink or higher fan speed, neither are needed for a card that is targeting OEM desktops. AIB cards are coming shortly for enthusiasts which will add £20-30 cost for exactly this, a bigger heatsink with better fans for silent running and great overclocking.
It also does not cost what a 970 does, a 1080 or 970 bought a month ago will cost less than they do if bought today. The dollar value of the 970 is more expensive than a RX480, by a noticeable margin, while being a much slower card in DX12.
What do you want to buy today, a card that provides decent DX11 performance, poor DX12 performance or reasonable DX11 performance and brilliant DX12 performance.... considering that 80%+ of the major performance requiring best looking games going forwards will be DX12?
Science Studio5 hours ago (edited)
- I should clarify. The only motherboards that will likely experience any issues are those with terrible power delivery integration or boards from ~2006 and earlier featuring PCIe 1.0 and 2.0 revisions. Most modern boards - even the cheap ones - should be fine. Again, my suggestion is (just to be safe): wait for third-party 480s to roll out. Search for the 8-pin and 6-pin x2 cards and opt for those. Thanks for watching!
Except I can buy an asus strix GTX 970 on this site for 209£ including 20 rebate.
If I go to anandtech, GTX 970 wins in tomb raider, dirt rally, cysts 3, the Witcher, gtav,
Rx480 wins in ashes of singularity and the division and hitman.
The rx480 consumes more power at idle, less under load.
GTX 970 temperature is 63 degrees load, rx480 80 degrees...GTX quieter at load, rx louder etc
Any more?
This is without doubt the lamest thread on these forums currently.
And that includes the many Brexit threads.
People just want to trash AMD for not releasing a 980Ti <$250 mark, that's it, just check the launch thread. "Omg such a fail, a 390/X perf at nearly 390 prices, AMD can just go and bankrupt."
Saying this over and over won't make it true.
Nobody was demanding for 980ti perf for £200.
I thought we'd get 980 perf for ~£200, maybe a shade less £. Boy was I wrong!
But a 980 isn't a 980ti, by a long shot.
And please don't keep saying it's 390/X perf, when it's 970/390 perf in everything bar a couple DX12 benchmarks
The future may look better for this card, but the future is not now, and it doesn't perform like a 390X now. It just doesn't.
480 confirmed can crash on certain mobos.
Except I can buy an asus strix GTX 970 on this site for 209£ including 20 rebate.
If I go to anandtech, GTX 970 wins in tomb raider, dirt rally, cysts 3, the Witcher, gtav,
Rx480 wins in ashes of singularity and the division and hitman.
The rx480 consumes more power at idle, less under load.
GTX 970 temperature is 63 degrees load, rx480 80 degrees...GTX quieter at load, rx louder etc
Any more?
Quite simply. Which do you think is the better card? I can't really belive we are in a position where buying the old tech is the wise choice....
Lets say you want to sell either card in 2 years to upgrade again. Which will 2nd hand users want to buy, the card that is 30% faster in BF1 and probably by then BF2 and 3 and has 8GB of memory, or the card that sucks in DX12 when all new games are DX12, has 4GB of memory and has literally no advantage at all?
I literally just bought a 390x because It is near as makes no difference the same price as the 480, and performs much better. No brainer for me. "EOL" means nothing in the real world. Still comes with a 2 year warranty. It's not as if it suddenly becomes "unsupported" or "unusable".
Quite simply. Which do you think is the better card? I can't really belive we are in a position where buying the old tech is the wise choice....