Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
What speed DDR5 are you planning on using as that may impact the choice of AMD Chipset?
Around 6000 M/Ts fine with X670 and R650 but above this, especially 7200 M/Ts and above then X870 may be best option.
What speed DDR5 are you planning on using as that may impact the choice of AMD Chipset?
Around 6000 M/Ts fine with X670 and R650 but above this, especially 7200 M/Ts and above then X870 may be best option.
If I was buying new I wouldn't buy anything less than the x870. I believe only the x870 and the x870e have support for the latest interfaces. I don't see the point in buying a new mobo (especially if I'm getting a 9800x3d) and not have one with pcie 5 for example.
What motherboards has everyone got / went with.
To further clarify on that, only dual CCD parts generally see benefit in 1:2 mode, and you need to run at least 7800Mhz or higher for it to be worthwhile. Single CCD parts don't see any real benefit, so stick with 1:1 mode.Best performing memory for a 3D processor is to keep the divider on 1:1, as such faster memory beyond 6200MHz is pointless on AMD platform.
Best efficiency is achieved with a 1:1 divider which is around 6000-6200MHz C28-C30 memory, my advise is save your money and buy a 6000MHz C30 kit, this will give best performance, if you want a little more try overclocking the kit towards 6200MHz or further tightening the timings down to C28.
I thought I read somewhere that we have no hardware current or even on the horizon that is capable of saturating PCIE 4, let alone 5. That's ultimately why I just went for a B650E. It does have PCIE5 but I personally wouldn't find any value in these top end boards. Perhaps I'm missing something though?If I was buying new I wouldn't buy anything less than the x870. I believe only the x870 and the x870e have support for the latest interfaces. I don't see the point in buying a new mobo (especially if I'm getting a 9800x3d) and not have one with pcie 5 for example.
I thought I read somewhere that we have no hardware current or even on the horizon that is capable of saturating PCIE 4, let alone 5. That's ultimately why I just went for a B650E. It does have PCIE5 but I personally wouldn't find any value in these top end boards. Perhaps I'm missing something though?
You're not missing anything - you have it right. PCIE 5 isn't essential for anyone at this point in time. And even if you want that for "future proofing", many B650E, X670 and X670E mobos include that feature. For example, my MSI Carbon X670E has 4 x Gen 5 M2 slots and supports PCIE 5. I could upgrade to the X870E equivalent if I wanted USB4, but hardly critical.I thought I read somewhere that we have no hardware current or even on the horizon that is capable of saturating PCIE 4, let alone 5. That's ultimately why I just went for a B650E. It does have PCIE5 but I personally wouldn't find any value in these top end boards. Perhaps I'm missing something though?
I take it the 2200 FCLK is necessary to overcome 1:2 ratio latency? Is 6600/2200 then the baseline at which 1:2 becomes better than 1:1?To further clarify on that, only dual CCD parts generally see benefit in 1:2 mode, and you need to run at least 7800Mhz or higher for it to be worthwhile. Single CCD parts don't see any real benefit, so stick with 1:1 mode.
The optimal for single CCD is 6600Mhz memory and 2200Mhz FCLK, but not all samples will be able to hit that. Both of mine can though.
8000/2000 should be good, but yeah generally. Test 8000/2000 vs 8000/2200, but i would expect 2200 to be faster if stable. 7800Mhz is the baseline i think for where 1:2 can start to compete with 6400 1:1. 8000+ for 6600 1:1. That's all for dual CCD only.I take it the 2200 FCLK is necessary to overcome 1:2 ratio latency? Is 6600/2200 then the baseline at which 1:2 becomes better than 1:1?
Main reason to buy a more expensive board might be for ram and layers of the mboard for signal integrity.I thought I read somewhere that we have no hardware current or even on the horizon that is capable of saturating PCIE 4, let alone 5. That's ultimately why I just went for a B650E. It does have PCIE5 but I personally wouldn't find any value in these top end boards. Perhaps I'm missing something though?
I take it the 2200 FCLK is necessary to overcome 1:2 ratio latency? Is 6600/2200 then the baseline at which 1:2 becomes better than 1:1?
8000/2000 should be good, but yeah generally. Test 8000/2000 vs 8000/2200, but i would expect 2200 to be faster if stable. 7800Mhz is the baseline i think for where 1:2 can start to compete with 6400 1:1. 8000+ for 6600 1:1. That's all for dual CCD only.
Oh, I thought above 6400 was automatically set to 1:2, thanks helpful!6600 is 1:1, no?