• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD VEGA confirmed for 2017 H1

Status
Not open for further replies.
250w vs 450w :p

75498.png


Official Anandtech Fury X Review said:
Equipped with an R9 Fury X, our system pulls 408W at the wall, a significant amount of power, but only 20W at the wall more than the same system with a GTX 980 Ti.

Source: http://www.anandtech.com/show/9390/the-amd-radeon-r9-fury-x-review/25

20W less, that's at stock.

Many people overclock their 980ti's, since they overclock so well etc. That pushes their power draw through the roof, higher than a FuryX even, since FuryX doesn't overclock :p
 
At first i thought 'thats a typo' but then looked at the rest of the specs again.... its not a typo.

hgjhk.png

I think it's a typo and was meant to read as the 390x, Why? Because it clearly states that we need at least 8 gb's of memory to run the HD texture pack. The Fiji chips haven't got enough memory so they're not up to the task meaning AMD users need to have either a 390, 390x , 8gb 480 or an 8gb 290 to run this texture pack. The reason it states the 390 instead of the 480 is because number wise the -90 sits higher than a -80 in the stack and while we know better (debatably) some promoter at Bethesda may not. I'm not saying a 390x matches a 1080 just that it's the closest AMD currently have with 8gb's of ram.
 
Re FO4 not had chance to play it yet its one on the pile to play ... so a nice little treat having this texture pack when i do ...
 
The 390 won't have the grunt, as its not just the 8GB vram thats needed, its the power of a 1080 as well, and AMD don't have card that comes anywhere near that :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom