• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD VEGA confirmed for 2017 H1

Status
Not open for further replies.
AMD Taking The Covers Off Vega, Navi & Zen+ On May 16th

http://wccftech.com/amd-taking-the-covers-off-vega-navi-may-16th/

"It's the sucessor to Polaris"

Wut? No it's not. It's like saying when there was the 370, 380 and 390 and x variants the 3 Fury SKU replaced those.

Vega is targeting high end and enthusiast and competing with nvidia's high end gpus such as the 1080ti and Titan(pascal) and then the 1070 and 1080 cards. Polaris never did target high end just low - mid range so how does Vega come and replace them? lol.
 
AMD talking about Zen+ this early? No way there's gonna be actual performance or price information, just standard marketing stuff.

Probably expand on the "easy" IPC and other improvements they know they can make.

They mentioned in their Last AMA that they've already identified areas in the design that should allow them to get decent boosts.

I expect it to appear next year, and slot into current AM4 boards with just a BIOS update.
 
Probably expand on the "easy" IPC and other improvements they know they can make.

They mentioned in their Last AMA that they've already identified areas in the design that should allow them to get decent boosts.
Hmm. I was expecting a small IPC boost (maybe 5% like Skylake or Broadwell) and a clock speed bump thanks to an improved process. If they manage both it'd be a nice upgrade but if they can get even more IPC uplift I'd be very impressed, especially since it'd put them ahead of Intel (who haven't had a >5% uplift since Haswell and won't have one until at least Icelake).

I expect it to appear next year, and slot into current AM4 boards with just a BIOS update.
Yeah that's pretty much a given.
 
Zen+ is the next iteration of the architecture.

Like Sandy bridge -> ivy bridge -> haswell

Same as Zen -> Zen+ -> Zen++

hmm thanks, i thought AMD were going down the route of zen -> zen2 -> zen3 naming for that and zen+ and zen2+ (the plus sign suggesting plus a gpu). That's me just going of what i read about gray hawk last year.
 
Hmm. I was expecting a small IPC boost (maybe 5% like Skylake or Broadwell) and a clock speed bump thanks to an improved process. If they manage both it'd be a nice upgrade but if they can get even more IPC uplift I'd be very impressed, especially since it'd put them ahead of Intel (who haven't had a >5% uplift since Haswell and won't have one until at least Icelake).


Yeah that's pretty much a given.

They'll get the improved process but there are other "bottlenecks" they can remedy. The CCX Interconnect is one of those.
Currently it runs at 1:2 RAM speed and has a max bandwidth of 22GB/s, but can apparently scale all the way up to 512GB/s for Naples and Vega Instinct implementations.
AMD's latency on cores in eachCCX is lower than Intel's per core, but latency when jumping between each CCX is rather significant.

Previous tests when disabling one CCX shows an average of 8% improvement in gaming; so if they can sort out the bandwidth and latency; along with further IPC gains they're on the right track.
 
Tbf RTG have barely hit their stride yet, Vega is just the beginning of the rung.

Yeah but like nasha said if they imply Navi is 'where the actions at' then that has implications not only for Vega but also for RTG going forward. After all Vega was (and i'm still confident is) the bad boy we've all been waiting for, if they backtrack on that now - well, it's a bad omen should we say.
 
This. That would be very annoying and i'm pretty sure it would weaken confidence in RTG to be able to produce the goods.

Tbf RTG have barely hit their stride yet, Vega is just the beginning of the rung.

Let's hope so,
They've done Polaris and a Polaris refresh now so please don't let there be any excuses.
It worries me because really it's an architecture that's been developed during the lean years
and we won't really see them at their best for at least a couple of years, that's presuming
that now Zen's out they can loosen the purse strings and give RTG a bit more money to play with.

After all Vega was (and i'm still confident is) the bad boy we've all been waiting for, if they backtrack on that now - well, it's a bad omen should we say.

It certainly would be.
 
Let's hope so,
They've done Polaris and a Polaris refresh now so please don't let there be any excuses.
It worries me because really it's an architecture that's been developed during the lean years
and we won't really see them at their best for at least a couple of years, that's presuming
that now Zen's out they can loosen the purse strings and give RTG a bit more money to play with.

I'm uncertain here but isn't RTG and AMD CPU division financially separate?
The Instinct cards give me hope that Vega can be a success.
 
Yeah but like nasha said if they imply Navi is 'where the actions at' then that has implications not only for Vega but also for RTG going forward. After all Vega was (and i'm still confident is) the bad boy we've all been waiting for, if they backtrack on that now - well, it's a bad omen should we say.

Vega better be good, otherwise it's a long time for 290/390/480 owners to be without an upgrade path - unless they go Nvidia and I'm sure AMD don't want that.
 
there is no doubt that vega in every iteration will be better than any other gpu AMD have out as of now. so ofcourse people on any other AMD gpu will have an upgrade path. the way people talk about these sync techs it would be worth having a card with 20% less power but could use the sync tech (free and g).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom