• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD VEGA confirmed for 2017 H1

Status
Not open for further replies.
At 1600Mhz it means this card has 13.1 TFLOPS, compared to stock 1080Ti of 10.6 TFLOPs; which isn't bad. Although seeing 16GB HBM2 makes me think this might be an Instinct or Radeon Pro cards, not Radeon RX.

HBM2 is hella expensive, who knows though.

If this is a Instinct of Pro then that bodes well for the RX Vega cards since the pro cards are usually lower clocked. A 1600MHz Fiji would be between a 1080 and 1080Ti and Vega is supposed to be much improved architecture. If this leak is true then even the low end Vega should be 1600MHz or more which is exciting.
 
Considering the memory configuration, it is likely an Mi25 part. some people argue about boost but even GP100 has a boost capability if the workload is not heavy. HPC parts will still boost as long as they can remain within their thermal and power envelope.

Yup, the costing for 16GB of (scarce!) HBM2 would be pretty insane...
 
Yup, the costing for 16GB of (scarce!) HBM2 would be pretty insane...

Not scarce, missing! SK Hynix are only showing 4GB 1.6GBps modules in their catalogue so far, which means Instinct/Radeon Pro needs 4 Modules per interposer to get 16GB.
8e04e0edef4a445ea6122762f33492a6.png


The Vega die shot shown, only shows 2 modules.
4fb4690719b24c218deaf6f88645bac9.png
 
However let's have a pause for thought and something intriguing.

AMD said that Vega and Ryzen would make an ecosystem if both are together.

The Ryzen cpu is SOC. Which means that would have direct access to the gpu and the HBM2.
If the 16gb HBM2 cache can be accessed by the CPU SOC, that would affect also the infinity fabric, greatly improving the perf on both components.
 
I don't know what it is but I won't buy a Titan card on pure principle even if I was rich and could afford any setup I wanted. I just cant justify awarding that kind of greed.
 
apparently the Pro Duo only shows specs for a single GPU in this test. 64CU and 4GB of memory.

https://compubench.com/device.jsp?b...pi=cl&D=AMD+Radeon(TM)+Pro+Duo&testgroup=info

But due to the memory size it is likely to be an Mi25 part.

Not scarce, missing! SK Hynix are only showing 4GB 1.6GBps modules in their catalogue so far, which means Instinct/Radeon Pro needs 4 Modules per interposer to get 16GB.
8e04e0edef4a445ea6122762f33492a6.png


The Vega die shot shown, only shows 2 modules.

Those are what they publicly have available, if AMD have a contract with them for 2Gbp/s HBM2 for 8 and 4GB stacks, then they are unlikely to show on their public product portfolio.
 
I don't know what it is but I won't buy a Titan card on pure principle even if I was rich and could afford any setup I wanted. I just cant justify awarding that kind of greed.
Me neither. Don't want a blower type anyway. If I won the lottery my RIG would have SLI 1080Tis in it. (even though im not a fan of multi GPU, if money is no object you know).
 
However let's have a pause for thought and something intriguing.

AMD said that Vega and Ryzen would make an ecosystem if both are together.

The Ryzen cpu is SOC. Which means that would have direct access to the gpu and the HBM2.
If the 16gb HBM2 cache can be accessed by the CPU SOC, that would affect also the infinity fabric, greatly improving the perf on both components.

If there was some sort of 1+1=3 factor to be gained from having Ryzen and Vega combo then I am sold!!
 
Those are what they publicly have available, if AMD have a contract with them for 2Gbp/s HBM2 for 8 and 4GB stacks, then they are unlikely to show on their public product portfolio.

Problem is 8GB Hynix modules weren't listed for production until end of the year.
There's also the possibility than AMD has opted to go to Samsung for supply larger modules for Instinct; similar to what NVIDIA has been doing for Tesla.

Even the Tesla V100 only has 900GB/s Bandwidth, which if they were using SK Hynix, would be 1024GB/s.

If that's the case I don't see why they wouldn't bother slapping 4 modules of Samsung 4GB on there for Instinct cards. The cost of 4 modules isn't an issue for Enterprise; and still leaves the original design for 2 4GB modules of the consumer gaming cards.

I do hope the lack of 2.0Gbps Hynix modules on the catalogue does mean AMD has first rights to it all, as without it they can't meat the Vega 10 specification of 512GB/s bandwidth using two modules.
 
Problem is 8GB Hynix modules weren't listed for production until end of the year.
There's also the possibility than AMD has opted to go to Samsung for supply larger modules for Instinct; similar to what NVIDIA has been doing for Tesla.

Even the Tesla V100 only has 900GB/s Bandwidth, which if they were using SK Hynix, would be 1024GB/s.

If that's the case I don't see why they wouldn't bother slapping 4 modules of Samsung 4GB on there for Instinct cards. The cost of 4 modules isn't an issue for Enterprise; and still leaves the original design for 2 4GB modules of the consumer gaming cards.

I do hope the lack of 2.0Gbps Hynix modules on the catalogue does mean AMD has first rights to it all, as without it they can't meat the Vega 10 specification of 512GB/s bandwidth using two modules.
where do you get that ? i thought SK started production of 2GB/pin in Q3 2016
oJ03dRV.jpg
DRAM and NAND flash giant SK Hynix will be ready to ship its 4GB stacked second generation high bandwidth memory (HBM2) by Q3 of this year. These HBM2 packages will be made up of four 1GB dies, with a bandwidth-per-pin of 1 Gbps, 1.6 Gbps, and 2 Gbps, working out to per-stack bandwidths of 128 GB/s, 204 GB/s, and 256 GB/s, respectively.
These chips will be targeted at graphics cards, network infrastructure, HPC, and servers. SK Hynix is also working on 8GB stacks, which will be made up of 1GB dies. These stacks will be targeted at high-end HPC and server applications. The company also has cost-effective 2GB 2-die stacks, for graphics cards. This 2GB, 2-die stack could be very important as competition against GDDR5X, especially in mid-range and performance segment graphics cards.
 
between glofo and hynx, AMD cannot catch a break :D

****ed either way :D

It really does feel that way. if SK Hynix lived up to their production ETAs we'd probably have Vega already; never mind GloFo.

I just hope the top Vega card we get isn't a compromise because of their partner's failing to live up to promises.
At least the 1600Mhz on a possible enterprise part is promising a bit; as those are usually clocked lower thn high end gaming equivalents.
 
apparently the Pro Duo only shows specs for a single GPU in this test. 64CU and 4GB of memory.

https://compubench.com/device.jsp?benchmark=compu20d&os=Windows&api=cl&D=AMD+Radeon(TM)+Pro+Duo&testgroup=info

But due to the memory size it is likely to be an Mi25 part.



Those are what they publicly have available, if AMD have a contract with them for 2Gbp/s HBM2 for 8 and 4GB stacks, then they are unlikely to show on their public product portfolio.
Why wouldn't they? Hynix were originally advertising 2.0GBps and only more recently dropped the 2,0 for 1.6Gbps chips. AMD undoubtedly do have a contract to course HBM2 form Hynix but that doesn't stop Hynix selling GBM2 to other parties The only 2 liekly scenarios is that Hynix simply can't make 2.0Gbps chips yet, or the volume is so small they can't supply AMD and other parties sufficiently. IF Hynix had good supply they absolutely would be marketing 2.0Gbps chips and selling them to other custoemrs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom