AMD Vs. Nvidia Image Quality - Old man yells at cloud

[bru]

The resolution has nothing to do with how much "detail" is displayed.

CGA image just to overemphasize just how wrong you are.

 

[james.miller]

The scaling is the same between a 1080 monitor and a 4k one twice the size.

Nope.

Pixel density is the most important thing for how sharp an image looks. Which is why when people went from 27" 1080 to 27" 4k monitors it looked much sharper.

Sharpness is not detail. They are not the same!

 

[Gregster]

No, nasher, you dont. If you render the same image, one at 4k and one at 1080p, then the renders are NOT the same. One has 25% of the pixels of the other. That is fact. You seem to be looking at this from a position where both displays would be used at a distance where the pixels would appear the same size to the viewer, but that's a convenience that ignore sever key factors, the biggest being we as viewers rarely ever do that.

Look up my posts on PPD (Not to be confused with PPI) and come back and tell me i still don't understand this.

Spot on. Take a game image at 1080P and then take the same image at 4K and you will notice far more detail in the 4K one. Nothing to do with PPI but a fact that there is more detail on the 4K screen.

 

[Nasher]

Spot on. Take a game image at 1080P and then take the same image at 4K and you will notice far more detail in the 4K one. Nothing to do with PPI but a fact that there is more detail on the 4K screen.

That's because you're comparing it on the same size screens.

 

[TNA]

Spot on. Take a game image at 1080P and then take the same image at 4K and you will notice far more detail in the 4K one. Nothing to do with PPI but a fact that there is more detail on the 4K screen.

Surprised to see you saying this Gregster maboy

I always thought that you mistakenly felt your expensive 1440p ultrawide monitor had better IQ than my 4K monitor

 

[james.miller]

That's because you're comparing it on the same size screens.

a 4k 50" panel will display more detail than a 1080p panel at any size.

 

[Ian Evey]

CGA image just to overemphasize just how wrong you are.

The amd red parrot has far more detail than the green nvidia parrot.

 

[bru]

The amd red parrot has far more detail than the green nvidia parrot.

Thank you for that I now have to clean tea off of my keyboard.

 

[Nasher]

a 4k 50" panel will display more detail than a 1080p panel at any size.

No, it won't.

 

[james.miller]

Yes, it will, 4 times as much.

 

[Nasher]

That's not how it works...

 

[4K8KW10]

That's not how it works...

They are just lobbying for the industry, this is why for them samsung is the best, and low quality screens are the best.
But this is not the topic of the thread, which they successfully derailed.

The topic of the thread is AMD vs nvidia image quality!

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/eeol3x/is_it_true_that_amd_color_and_image_quality_is

[URL]https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/e8co6p/my_experience_with_the_5700xt_from_the_titan_x//[/URL]

 

[ICDP]

A 4K image carries 4 times the detail of a 1080p image, how can this not be clear (pardon the pun)?

Take a 4K image and resize it to 1080p, you end up with a very blurry version of the original image. If you start with a 1080p image and resize to 4K you can never increase the detail.

 

[Disco_P]

Lol

Well done, you have joined us on his ignore list with that comment

Best Christmas present ever

 

[james.miller]

That's not how it works...

It really is. more pixels = more detail. This is ignoring the quality of the source material being displayed of course.

Are you also arguing that ultraHD blurays are no more detailed than regular blurays?

Remember when Full HD seemed like the sharpest picture you could get? With four times as many pixels as HD, 4K resolution has completely changed the level of visual detail and clarity we've come to expect from our screens.

small TVs opting for the detailed resolution to entice viewers – and the truly premium sets out there opting for 8K resolution instead. With Black Friday and Cyber Monday around the corner, too, nabbing a new 4K TV among the best Black Friday TV deals could well be on your agenda.

There's no doubt about it: 4K Ultra HD is now the industry standard for television panels, with the increased detail bearing even more fruit at larger television sizes where you're able to see the difference more clearly.

https://www.techradar.com/uk/news/t...erything-you-need-to-know-about-4k-tv-1258884

Are you disputing this?

They are just lobbying for the industry, this is why for them samsung is the best, and low quality screens are the best.
But this is not the topic of the thread, which they successfully derailed.

The topic of the thread is AMD vs nvidia image quality!

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/eeol3x/is_it_true_that_amd_color_and_image_quality_is

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/e8co6p/my_experience_with_the_5700xt_from_the_titan_x//

This guy, lol. Starts talking about old phones, gets his argument completely obliterated then calls everybody else thread derailing 'industry lobbyists'. Why isnt he banned yet?

 

[Nasher]

It really is. more pixels = more detail. This is ignoring the quality of the source material being displayed of course.

Are you also arguing that ultraHD blurays are no more detailed than regular blurays?


https://www.techradar.com/uk/news/t...erything-you-need-to-know-about-4k-tv-1258884

Are you disputing this?



This guy, lol. Starts talking about old phones, gets his argument completely obliterated then calls everybody else thread derailing 'industry lobbyists'. Why isnt he banned yet?

Again, that is comparing screens of the same size which are different resolutions. A small 1080 screen will have a better image than a really big 4k screen.

But also the quality of screen itself is a factor, many 4k panels aren't actually that good. But people lap up the marketing.

 

[james.miller]

No, that was comparing media (bluray vs UHD bluray). screen sizes were not even mentioned.

A small 1080 screen will have a better image than a really big 4k screen.

there are just too many other factors involved for this blanket statement to be true 100% of the time. or even 50%.

 

[james.miller]

dp ..

 

[chaosophy]

Again, that is comparing screens of the same size which are different resolutions. A small 1080 screen will have a better image than a really big 4k screen.

But also the quality of screen itself is a factor, many 4k panels aren't actually that good. But people lap up the marketing.

Hmmm, how far does your belief go with this though? Let's try pushing the extremes a bit...

You seem to be saying a lower res smaller screen with a higher PPI is going to give a more detailed image ?

Screen 1
480x480 pixels, 1"x1"
230,400 total pixels, with 480 PPI

Screen 2
4,096x4,096, 10"x10"
16,777,216 total pixels, with 409.6 PPI

following from your logic screen 1 is the better screen? All else being equal.

Somewhere your argument breaks imo.

Detail = information = pixels.

 

[TNA]

Best Christmas present ever

This guy, lol. Starts talking about old phones, gets his argument completely obliterated then calls everybody else thread derailing 'industry lobbyists'. Why isnt he banned yet?

As the OcUK chat bot, it has immunity