Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Jul 2012
- Posts
- 16,124
- Location
- London
I don't know how you guys have let the 'Chop so easily draw you into this.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
AMD VSR against Nvidia DSR Review
- Thread starter Final8y
- Start date
GTX 580 was first with 3GB and then AMD followed that with the 7970
Yes, indeed they did on older tech, pointless over my original stock 79/290 point, which is standard, not a premium version that came with extra vram.
Pfft.
AMD running 3/4Gb stock over a year on the 79/290 series, bwaa bwaa Nvidia copied AMD, AMD was out first....
Hard pill to swallow discussing who brought out a stock feature set first?
Last edited:
Definitely good news for gamers.
The other thing this could do is speed up the move to 4K becoming more mainstream. If people start buying GPUs fast enough to run DSR/VSR then it is only a small step to go the whole way and get a 4K monitor too.
The AMD variant is very stuttery to me.
Some serious tearing going on in that on VSR. That would be unplayable to me.
As for Tommybhoy, you can argue those semantics all day but nVidia were first to release a 3GB card and a 4GB card, so throw that up as much as you like, you are clearly barking up the wrong tree
I never understand why people argue about who did what first as it is history and no use to me at all.
All I am interested in is what is available now and what will be available in the next month or so.
Now where have those £$%^&*( Big Max Titans got to.
All I am interested in is what is available now and what will be available in the next month or so.
Now where have those £$%^&*( Big Max Titans got to.
The AMD variant is very stuttery to me.
Some serious tearing going on in that on VSR. That would be unplayable to me.
As for Tommybhoy, you can argue those semantics all day but nVidia were first to release a 3GB card and a 4GB card, so throw that up as much as you like, you are clearly barking up the wrong tree
I think you must have some Placebo seeing what you want to see going there Greg.
As for Tommybhoy, you can argue those semantics all day but nVidia were first to release a 3GB card and a 4GB card, so throw that up as much as you like, you are clearly barking up the wrong tree
6Gb/8Gb by your logic then, who was first..............
Oh wait a minute better not count the 8Gb undisputed 4K champ.......
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,220
I am assuming on the amd side they are using a 285 which probably explains the stutter or sluggish frames. My reasoning they use 4k. As for the tearing I noticed it a few times but it was far from happening a lot. I never checked out the Nv side and assume they probably used a more powerful card.
They did say they used a 285 on the AMD side, they said nothing about the Nvidia side.
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,220
This is also about dsr v vsr and what the effect does not who's game is running better. Performance has nothing to do with it.
Where is the evidence that they've been working on it longer? I didn't realise fanboys had VIP access to the GPU manufacturers R&D timetables.
Even if it's true and AMD did start working on it first, it only shows how chronically slow they are when NVidia knocked it up and shipped it out in a fraction of the time.
Very true.
Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Jul 2012
- Posts
- 16,124
- Location
- London
You reckon you could go for a few posts without saying fanboys? Considering your obvious leanings, it's beyond ironic.
Seriously, do a search for "mmj_uk AMD fanboys"
Seriously, do a search for "mmj_uk AMD fanboys"
Fair point that.
@ Tommybhoy
Getting a little desperate now Son and changed it from 3GB and 4GB to 8GB.... Nice one bwahhhh hahahahaha
You reckon you could go for a few posts without saying fanboys? Considering your obvious leanings, it's beyond ironic.
Seriously, do a search for "mmj_uk AMD fanboys"
Returned 2 pages of threads, half of them with 'Deleted post', what does that say about it?
Last edited:
you are right DSR is better in the videos which i mentioned before. someone said but who plays bioshock
if people cant see the difference in quality eye test time.
Ahhh if you think the one on the left is smooth then maybe that explains why you dont see the stutter in your videos?
@ Tommybhoy
Getting a little desperate now Son and changed it from 3GB and 4GB to 8GB.... Nice one bwahhhh hahahahaha
'I'll post a straw pic coz I can't answer....'
Yet you stated premium series 'extra vram' when I put up stock spec and I got the straw pic?
6Gb/8Gb by your logic then, who was first..............
Oh wait a minute better not count the 8Gb undisputed 4K champ.......
Point you missed, like I have said many times before, they both have features the other doesn't-the other one may implement it at a later date or might not even implement it at all.
How much 'AMD's had Eyefinity for years' did you read every time you mentioned surround gaming?
What other features can I spam the forum with that Nvidia/AMD don't support, or took sometimes years longer to support?
Didn't hear it from the high posters, every other post right now be it Gsync/DSR it's 'we had it first', change the record please, then we don't have to go through the same old **** every other thread.
Dunno about that like, i could see stutter in one of your recordings that you insist wasn't there