• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD VSR against Nvidia DSR Review

VSR is quite stuttery in those videos, it's pretty clear. What's with the tearing though? i thought they would have captured those videos straight from the desktop, so why the tearing? or did they capture them externally?
 
'I'll post a straw pic coz I can't answer....':rolleyes:

Yet you stated premium series 'extra vram' when I put up stock spec and I got the straw pic?

And I clearly did answer.

Pfft.

AMD running 3/4Gb stock over a year on the 79/290 series, bwaa bwaa Nvidia copied AMD, AMD was out first....:o

Think I'll throw that up every time 'were out first' gets put up...


Bwaa!!! I don't give a damn.:D

Right I will do it again, as you clearly decided to do it and this is the last time.

"AMD running 3/4Gb stock over a year on the 79/290 series"

nVidia were running 3GB on the 580 and 4GB on the 670 and 680 long before AMD on both counts.

So your point was completely irrelevant/wrong/lying through your back teeth and yet again, you are not discussing the thread at all and just looking for an argument.

Back on topic please.

I have said it before and I will say it again. With AMD and nVidia pushing hard on new techs, it results in "Win win" for us consumers, so regardless of who was first with what, we all win in the end.
 
Last edited:
I call BS I've seen bioshock infinite side by side and DSR is blatantly sharper overall as it preserves detail better in low and mixed contrast areas which take up quite a bit of most screens, AMD handles high contrast edges a bit better in that game with better defined, superior anti-aliased edges and in some cases high contrast text i.e. signs over shops can be readable further away on VSR if they are light text on a dark background. To say one is better than the other in that game comes down to personal preference.
 
And I clearly did answer.



Right I will do it again, as you clearly decided to do it and this is the last time.

"AMD running 3/4Gb stock over a year on the 79/290 series"

nVidia were running 3GB on the 580 and 4GB on the 670 and 680 long before AMD on both counts.

So your point was completely irrelevant/wrong/lying through your back teeth and yet again, you are not discussing the thread at all and just looking for an argument.

Pfft.

AMD running 3/4Gb stock over a year on the 79/290 series, bwaa bwaa Nvidia copied AMD, AMD was out first....:o

Think I'll throw that up every time 'were out first' gets put up...


Bwaa!!! I don't give a damn.:D

My point was completely relevant, stock 1.5Gb/2Gb, which makes me not wrong/not lying through my back teeth and yet again, didn't start an argument-you started the ball rolling in post 35...
 
Last edited:
This is Bioshock Infinite resampled. scaled down from 5120x2880

LP2Dw09mP.jpg

My point was completely relevant, stock 1.5Gb/2Gb, which makes me not wrong/not lying through my back teeth and yet again, didn't start an argument-you started the ball rolling in post 35...

For my own amusement...Were AMD first out with 3GB GPUs and then 4GB GPUs? Call it what you like but were they?

You don't need to answer, as we both know they weren't and it is still staying off topic.
 
Last edited:
Nope, but they were the first to standardise those stock vram amounts, what I said in the very beginning, if I wanted to, I would have stated first to 6Gb/8Gb, would you have been happier I phrased it that way?

Would you have actually answered those points?

Will you ever shut up about we were first?

Or does the forum need pointed out every other post with counter arguments on who did what first instead of reading the good stuff?
 
Arguing over who was "copying" who and who was first with what. Feel like ive just stepped into a playground ffs. :rolleyes: Wind yer necks in the lot of you, this **** measuring contest is getting pathetic.
 
Didn't it just.

The only target I went for was not addressing what was written in front of you Greg, nothing more nothing less, no stupid straw pics, no accusations of lies, pointed out again and again and you still haven't answered, but we know why.

I seriously thought being a boss in the past would have been the end of these types of bickering with you leading by example and keeping the peace, now it's the victim card.:(

Unless I'm drawn back in with the perpetrator or one of the mates, done with this BS.:(
 
Back
Top Bottom