Caporegime
ARMA III on high end Intel CPUs is significantly faster compared to Ryzen 2000,so the jump with Ryzen 3000 is significant,as its an example of a game,people tend to use Intel CPUs for.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
We have lift off!
I will and am considering AMD. ARMA 3 is about as tough a single threaded test as there is. I don't understand why AMD's CPU topology is an issue.
Arma 3 is a really popular game, came out six years ago (enough time to build a CPU that can get good performance out of it) and exemplifies the difference between turgid console ports and PC gaming.
All I expect is parity rather than a late to the party approximation but 10-15% slower. Racing sims, Flight sims, Arma 3 are the types of game that demand the most out of CPUs and if AMD
can't cut it then I'm not interested. I'm GPU limited in everything else at 4K.
I think there's been a patch since that video but a difference of 35fps to 55fps at 4K in Arma 3 means more to me than a CS:GO jump from 250 to 290 fps at 1080.
To me it suggests there's a fundamental flaw in the architecture of AMD CPUs.
If the newest Ryzen 3000 CPUs still run 10-25% slower than Intel CPUs in Arma 3 or racing sims (against an Intel CPU architecture that hasn't progressed substantially in six years) or even 10% then it begs the question wtf have AMD been doing all this time?
This has the first ARMA III test I have seen on Ryzen 3000:
https://www.planet3dnow.de/cms/wp-content/gallery/amd-ryzen-3000/d24.png
A massive jump in performance over the previous generation!
Well there you go Jacky, 22% performance increase.
Finally got my 3900x up and running today, had a load of problems with bsod and lock ups as decided to do a fresh install of Winders. Problem was it was a 2015 version, so ryzen unaware. Eventually sorted that and now seems stable, but not seeing it boosting properly. 4325 on a single core is the most I'm seeing... is this normal?
yeah 4.35ghz on sigle core at stock is normal, the bios of most x570 boards arnt working properly with boost clocks yet, this will only get better but best to wait until a conformed bios works as it should, i have my 3900x overclocked on all cores at 4350mhz at 1.2875v at the moment keeping a close eye for a new bios so i can get 4.6ghz eventually, but for now 12 cores at 4.35ghz wipes the floor with everything XD
Its more than that!! Its 28% for the Ryzen 7 3700X and 24% for the Ryzen 9 3900X!
yeah 4.35ghz on sigle core at stock is normal, the bios of most x570 boards arnt working properly with boost clocks yet, this will only get better but best to wait until a conformed bios works as it should, i have my 3900x overclocked on all cores at 4350mhz at 1.2875v at the moment keeping a close eye for a new bios so i can get 4.6ghz eventually, but for now 12 cores at 4.35ghz wipes the floor with everything XD
Nice voltage too. What cooling have you got and temps are you seeing?
Anyone here running on a B450m Mortar? Did the bios flash last night, awaiting delivery of the 3700x tomorrow, first Amd CPU since Atholn II
I'm on Asrock x470 Taichi (bios 3.43), so not sure if that's affected too.
If you do have AMD CPUs, any chance you could test them out on CEMU so we can get a decent measure of the IPC increase in single threaded performance?
give it time all am4 x370, x470 and x570 will get bios updates so the cpu should all hit rated boost clocks, as ever time is the key factor
custom 360mm 45mm thick rad and max temp is 75 degrees which is a lot better than auto volts (1.45v) hitting 90 degrees before
I've failed at basic maths there, this is what waiting for the 3700X does to a man