I will and am considering AMD. ARMA 3 is about as tough a single threaded test as there is. I don't understand why AMD's CPU topology is an issue.
Arma 3 is a really popular game, came out six years ago (enough time to build a CPU that can get good performance out of it) and exemplifies the difference between turgid console ports and PC gaming.
All I expect is parity rather than a late to the party approximation but 10-15% slower. Racing sims, Flight sims, Arma 3 are the types of game that demand the most out of CPUs and if AMD
can't cut it then I'm not interested. I'm GPU limited in everything else at 4K.
I think there's been a patch since that video but a difference of 35fps to 55fps at 4K in Arma 3 means more to me than a CS:GO jump from 250 to 290 fps at 1080.
To me it suggests there's a fundamental flaw in the architecture of AMD CPUs.
If the newest Ryzen 3000 CPUs still run 10-25% slower than Intel CPUs in Arma 3 or racing sims (against an Intel CPU architecture that hasn't progressed substantially in six years) or even 10% then it begs the question wtf have AMD been doing all this time?