Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I swapped out my gtx 980 for a 1080ti today and now my cpu vcore has gone up. it now idles at 1.48v![]()
Talking of which, I stumbled across this recent Reddit which is definitely worth reading.
https://reddit.app.link/L6zwOzrBLY
AB bioses i posted here they are ******* TERRIBLE bugged more than anything.I see that ASUS have updated their bios to AGESA 1.0.0.3 Patch AB, anyone tried it yet. its available for X470 Prime at least
single rankWell that's disappointing. 400% HCI stable but still ram freezing.
I'm gonna give the dram calculator another go.
This 8 pack memory sticks are they single or dual rank?
I see that ASUS have updated their bios to AGESA 1.0.0.3 Patch AB, anyone tried it yet. its available for X470 Prime at least
I'm not sure if this has been asked or discussed previously but I am curious as to AMD's options in regard to assembling the Ryzen 3000 series.
We know that each CPU can contain up to 2 core chiplets together with an IO die.
With 6, 8, 12 and shortly 16 core chips available, what are the possibilities that AMD can make these CPUs in more than one configuration, but call them the same thing?
For example:
The 3600x is 6 cores and contains 1 ccx with 6 functioning cores.
The 3700x is 8 cores and contains 1 ccx with 8 functioning cores.
The 3900x is 12 cores containing 2 ccx with 6 functioning cores in each.
My question is, can AMD make these CPUs using other combinations or does it have to be done this way?
ie - Could the 3700x be made using 2 ccx with 4 functioning cores in each, etc.
Anyone heard reports of testing on it yet outside the ASUS forum thread?AB bioses i posted here they are ******* TERRIBLE bugged more than anything.
https://rog.asus.com/forum/showthread.php?102858-Asus-Strix-X470-F-Gaming-owners-thread/page130
That's why I dont do auto... They are all ****** up cause bioses are in beta state. I noticed on 3rd row of memory timings on auto 2 values tend to change every other reset by 1 up 1 down !!!! So one reboot you are running 9 other 8 other 7 so if 7 and 8 are stable oens and 7 is too tight then you got stable system 2/3ds of time grreat init ??Silver lining to my ram freezes is that I downloaded the Ryzen Dram calculator and it showed me that 3733MHz is doable. Windows boots and I can play games.
As for timings I did it a dirty and quick way. I didn't bother to put all the sub timings etc in just the essentials.
16 16 16 16 32 @ 3733MHz @ 1.4v
So far as I mentioned I had a quick game and it seems fine. Time will tell. I've lost faith in HCI as it proved to me that spending hours to pass 400% means nothing if after a few hours you still get freezes in game.
@Zeed For now I've left SOC voltage as is. I'll keep it in mind and bump it if needed.
If I just play with dram voltage and soc voltage and not touch anything else, do I have a change of getting this 100% stable at 3733MHz?
---
Side note. Remember how much difficulty I was having with my 2700x and getting DOCP 3200MHz working? Well it was the BIOS all along. The last BIOS Asus released for my board allowed me to set DOCP and gain 100% stability. Now look at me aiming for 3733MHz!!![]()
how about overclockers.net all of us tried AB and after 1-2 days went back to 1.0.0.2 cause they run crap in comparrisonAnyone heard reports of testing on it yet outside the ASUS forum thread?
People in there arnt the brightest bunch ive seen, but there does seem to be some complaints around RAM as a result of the latest.
how is memory training after reboot ?? And how is memory trainign booting from cold ?? Maybe they fixed them up a bit cause none of bioses for Crosshair motherboards made it out of forums they ware so bad. Image ME having boot problems first time from 4 bioses so farYes installed via internet flash on my X470 Prime Pro. Definitely works better with the new chipset drivers now. On Ryzen Master I'm getting lower voltages, before it was locked to around 1.45v with the new chipset drivers.
Crap in comparison how?how about overclockers.net all of us tried AB and after 1-2 days went back to 1.0.0.2 cause they run crap in comparrisonand all of us there testing bioses sincce first alpha ones on Zen1 lol
I wriote 3 posts about this. Stability is also WORSE I'm around 100points in cb20also loosing points in geekbench
reposting
![]()
To quote myself, i just applied the new BIOS.Crap in comparison how?
My main concern right now is if the sleep bug is fixed.![]()
To quote myself, i just applied the new BIOS.
.../...
After a singular test, sleep appears fixed too!
There's also a new version of HWInfo out too, and it seems to be reporting things more inline with what Ryzen Master reports too.
Just retested here and its still aparentely working again.I have the Prime X470 Pro, though still on Ryzen+ 2600X, and after updating to 5204 I'm still seeing that same sleep issue which appeared with the 3000 supporting Combo PI Bioses which is usually triggered by running Hwinfo sensor monitoring.
Just retested here and its still aparentely working again.
From what i can tell, everything appears to be working for me.
Its just Task Manager not reporting anything about my RAM, but i dont know what could be causing that, the BIOS update, or the new RAM...