-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
AMD Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000) - *** NO COMPETITOR HINTING ***
- Thread starter Jamin280672
- Start date
savage 
Fixed that for you.
Its not though, 69c -74 c all cores at 5ghz (see below)
So 90c is incorrect. So Fixed that for you.
Now I wouldn't have posted that image unless you were determined to spout nonsense. Now you have cluttered this thread by me having to prove you wrong yet again.
Stop with you 9900k intel hate...Its boring.
74 degrees after 10 seconds of cinebench? not even enough time to circulate the loop!! lolIts not though, 69c -74 c all cores at 5ghz (see below)
So 90c is incorrect. So Fixed that for you.
Now I wouldn't have posted that image unless you were determined to spout nonsense. Now you have cluttered this thread by me having to prove you wrong yet again.
Stop with you 9900k intel hate...Its boring.
Lets see it after an hour of Fft's. It will boil.
You get MANY more viable chiplets on a wafer at 7nm and that's significantly cheaper. AMD could afford to undercut INTEL massively and wipe the floor with them. Will they? yes and no. They WILL mark it much cheaper than INTEL, but not for an absolute pittance.
Associate
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2017
- Posts
- 1,762
Yeah that's what I'm saying, I think the price will be £200ish or under for the chip held up at CES, however I believe that it will match or beat the 9900k on productivity and a lot of multithreaded benches and real world productivity, but I still think that in gaming scenarios it will lack behind the 9900k. Guessing it wont be a million miles behind in the gaming aspect though and the 12/16 core higher frequency models will likely take the gaming crown away. I don't think it will be by much though...
He doesnt get this. He just cant comprehend that you would sell something better, for cheaper. Yet it happens all the time to grab mind and market share. Think samsung phones 10 years ago. Way cheaper than iphone and a good deal better.
Quick question. I'm looking to upgrade in the near future. I'm on a i7 3770k with an RX480.
So my first question is, What would be a decent Zen 2 upgrade to complement my GPU when they come out. Secondly when are the leaked release dates and lastly, what price would I be looking at for the trio of MB, CPU and RAM?
So my first question is, What would be a decent Zen 2 upgrade to complement my GPU when they come out. Secondly when are the leaked release dates and lastly, what price would I be looking at for the trio of MB, CPU and RAM?
Already had his video up from Tuesday night, new one, according to his discord chat, is between now and the weekend.
Associate
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2019
- Posts
- 617
@easyrider just to clarify, what is your CB score in that image? You said 2138 previously, yet the image shows 2070. Just want to be 100% certain that you aren't posting false information, otherwise you'd have to be banned by your own reasoning. 
The 8 core mid range Zen 2
Nothing firm on release dates - Possibly end of Q2 start Q3
You'll need new DDR4 RAM (16 gig is sweet spot)
Mobo - Either the 550 mobo's or even 470 mobo last gen
8 core zen 2 as showed at CES - This will be the mid range AMD cpu. (same as the 2600 series 6 core CPUs levels now) possibly 3600 series? Nothing concrete in naming yet.
Well I don't play FFT and nope it didn't under testing...So again your incorrect.
Computex.
AdoredTV and Wccftech are liars. The troll was right
Now that Zen 2 is "confirmed" for a Computex launch, what's going to happen at CES? https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/a32jcw/now_that_zen_2_is_confirmed_for_a_computex_launch/
https://www.techspot.com/news/77669-amd-expected-launch-new-x570-chipset-pci-e.html
AMD is expected to launch new X570 chipset with PCI-E 4.0 at Computex
Leak: X570 chipset and Ryzen 3000 with PCIe 4.0 launch at Computex 2019 https://www.pcbuildersclub.com/en/2018/12/leak-x570-chipset-and-ryzen-3000-with-pcie-4-0-launch-at-computex-2019/
Many thanks for that. I take it the 550 Mobos will be backwards compatible with a bios fix. 8 core is mid range? That sounds pricey!
@easyrider just to clarify, what is your CB score in that image? You said 2138 previously, yet the image shows 2070. Just want to be 100% certain that you aren't posting false information, otherwise you'd have to be banned by your own reasoning.
That top score is my highest score after multiple runs...2070 was 4.7ghz
Associate
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2019
- Posts
- 617
Mid ranged for AMD. Top of the range for Intel.
Very unlikely to be pricey. Anything from £2-300 IMO.
Associate
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2019
- Posts
- 617
I thought that you said that you ran 5.0GHz stable. Pretty sure that's the CB result that you were asked to provide, yet your bench there was at 4.7GHz as yu are saying now.
As you know, the orange colouring represents the current run score.
So I'm confused. Are you running 5.0GHz stable? Or is that just hot air? You surely didn't have enough time between when asked to perform the run, and when you provided a result, for you to change the clocks down.
Associate
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2019
- Posts
- 617
I guess next question, multiple choice to make it easier for you, is:
Given that your 4.7GHz score is in the right ballpark of what we'd expect a 9900K to score, do you think that the Ryzen 8c ES, that scored a similar CB score yesterday, was...
a) clocked above 4.7GHz,
b) clocked at 4.7GHz, or
c) clocked below 4.7GHz?
Given that your 4.7GHz score is in the right ballpark of what we'd expect a 9900K to score, do you think that the Ryzen 8c ES, that scored a similar CB score yesterday, was...
a) clocked above 4.7GHz,
b) clocked at 4.7GHz, or
c) clocked below 4.7GHz?
AdoredTV and Wccftech are liars. The troll was right
Are you special?
Firstly, you cannot accuse AdoredTV or WCCFtech to be "liars" if their sources prove to be incorrect. Secondly, exactly what did AdoredTV lie about? Jim said Ryzen 3000 will be announced at CES. It was. He even posted a video having to make an unnecessary clarification on how words work, clearly explaining the difference between "announced" and "launched".
And as for the HU troll? How were they right? They said that Ryzen 3000 was not getting a single mention AT ALL AT CES. And yet he had a goddamn cinebench run showing an 8c/16t engineering sample match a 9900K!
Jesus wept, man!
Its not though, 69c -74 c all cores at 5ghz (see below)
So 90c is incorrect. So Fixed that for you.
Now I wouldn't have posted that image unless you were determined to spout nonsense. Now you have cluttered this thread by me having to prove you wrong yet again.
Stop with you 9900k intel hate...Its boring.
2138, great score, amazing tho don't you think when you realise that is overclocked and just 4% faster than an unreleased midrange Ryzen 3600X whose clocks have not yet even been finalised, incredible how in just a few months a CPU costing less than half that will likely beat that ^^^^
Isn't competition great? that heat tho... wow thats an inefficient CPU. eh?