• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000) - *** NO COMPETITOR HINTING ***

Associate
Joined
31 Dec 2011
Posts
816
Well my old z97 lga 1150 board just packed in so Im in a quandry. My 4690k was long in the tooth but was fine at 4.2ghz .

Now I havent a flippin clue what to get. Thinking Ryzen 2600 and given I dont have a working PC, the alternative of forking out too much for an ancient z97 board to tide me over to see what Ryzen 3xxx is like is a bit annoying.

Yes, as others have said. Get a 2600 and a decent x470. You won't have any issues unless your going extreme overclocking with the 16core ryzen 3000. Its what I did 3 months ago and am so impressed I will wait for ryzen 3000 prices to drop a little before replacing. Seriously good bang for buck and mine replaced a 4790k.
 
Associate
Joined
21 May 2018
Posts
123
Yes, as others have said. Get a 2600 and a decent x470. You won't have any issues unless your going extreme overclocking with the 16core ryzen 3000. Its what I did 3 months ago and am so impressed I will wait for ryzen 3000 prices to drop a little before replacing. Seriously good bang for buck and mine replaced a 4790k.
That is what I did: 2600 and a x470 Strix, hopefully enough for a 3700x

My question is, I have an ultrawide AW3418DW, will I see any difference between a 2600 and a 3700x if I play in ultrawide resolutions or it will be bottlenecked by the graphics card 99% of the time?
 
Soldato
Joined
19 Feb 2011
Posts
5,849
That is what I did: 2600 and a x470 Strix, hopefully enough for a 3700x

My question is, I have an ultrawide AW3418DW, will I see any difference between a 2600 and a 3700x if I play in ultrawide resolutions or it will be bottlenecked by the graphics card 99% of the time?

Funnily enough i swapped from a 1440p 144hz screen yesterday to a 35" 3440x1440p 100hz screen, i benched Division 2 on both screens and GPU usage on the UW was sat at 98-99% for the entire time, was around 95% on the 1440p iirc. Definitely more GPU bound on an ultrawide id say.
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Jan 2006
Posts
24,955
Location
Chadderton, Oldham
I'm happy my B350 motherboard got a bios update for newer CPUs which should mean Zen 2, the only driving force for me getting a new CPU is to make Cities Skylines run better, relly does need a faster 8 core CPU.
 
Associate
Joined
21 May 2018
Posts
123
Funnily enough i swapped from a 1440p 144hz screen yesterday to a 35" 3440x1440p 100hz screen, i benched Division 2 on both screens and GPU usage on the UW was sat at 98-99% for the entire time, was around 95% on the 1440p iirc. Definitely more GPU bound on an ultrawide id say.
so basically changing from a 260 to a 3700x won't change anything gaming wise?
 
Associate
Joined
28 Mar 2018
Posts
1,430
God this waiting is killing me, i have even started looking at a 9900K build instead lol... Wifes told me i need to build the kids a PC sooner rather than later, the plan was to get a Zen2 build for myself, and give the kids my Ryzen 1700 build, id keep my Vega 64 and they can have the 1080FE i have spare to pair with my 1440p 144hz screen as i want to upgrade to a 3440x1440p screen (looking at that new MSI).

But with no solid info on Zen2 coming out anytime soon, im tempted just to say sod it and getting a 9900K, but i just know i will regret it down the line :(
Why 9900k will still be faster for gaming than than Ryzen 3000.
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
47,676
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
I think the 9900K will be faster for gaming but the question is by how much? given that the only difference between the 9900K and Ryzen 2700 in gaming performance is down to the clock speed, 15 to 20% i doubt it will be much, probably 5% and is that really a noteworthy difference?
 
Soldato
Joined
19 Feb 2011
Posts
5,849
Just ignore him, anyone basing a processor performance on price is a moron anyhow..

I'd tell him to check out the 1800x Vs 6900k at release but he's probably just trolling for the Lola and if he isn't he's clearly stupid enough that he won't be able to do a basic search to back up his posts
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
47,676
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
Yeah there is also this....


The 2080TI is the fastest GPU available right now and the 8700K is in these 4 games at 1080P:

20% faster
18% faster
3% faster
3% slower

You add 15% performance to that for Ryzen 3000, 8 core £200 Ryzen 3000 and what do you have? coffeelake about 5% faster.

o4IVRQT.png

KrK194b.png

1AHCM9Z.png
sOmFTZC.png
 
Back
Top Bottom