Associate
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 895
That test is very old. The time when most ram cant even be set at 3200 MHz. And Gen 1 is a bit slower than Gen 1+. Several Agesa have been put out which improved Ryzen a good % performance.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
AMD Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000) - *** NO COMPETITOR HINTING ***
- Thread starter Jamin280672
- Start date
That test is very old. The time when most ram cant even be set at 3200 MHz. And Gen 1 is a bit slower than Gen 1+. Several Agesa have been put out which improved Ryzen a good % performance.
https://www.tomshardware.co.uk/intel-discontinues-core-x-series-skylake-x-processors,news-60834.html
Looks like Ryzen 3000 might have pushed Skylake X over the edge...
Looks like Ryzen 3000 might have pushed Skylake X over the edge...
Permabanned
the most pointless CPU's ever
Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Nov 2018
- Posts
- 2,717
15% IPC improvement + 13% higher clocks = 25% improvement.
Also twice the cache, double the floating point performance, lower latency, 37% better multithreaded performance than a 9700K.
The total improvement is huge. The 3600 4.2GHz destroys the 8700 4.6GHz!!!
It doesn't work like that. With 12 logical processors, which contain 50% virtual ones, you can't beat a 9700K with 37%.
The slide showed that a 3800X that is 16 logical processors beat a 9700K with 37% https://videocardz.com/80798/amd-ryzen-3000-series-12-core-ryzen-9-3900x-at-499-usd
It doesn't work like that. You don't compare a future, yet unreleased processor with the last-generation from the competition.
Soldato
You do when its the same performance in games as the 9900k
Permabanned
load of crap, nones had a chip to play with yet,
Permabanned
why? should we compare with sandbridge instead?
Soldato
Hardly, talk about click bait, that's the 'old' 7000 series HEDT not the newest 9000 series which is identical almost apart from the obligatory minor clock speed boost.
Caporegime
I really don't give a crap about Intel's latency, we know what that is, why should anyone care about comparing Zen 2 latency to Intel?
Anyway, if the IPC is up 13% in ST its 10% higher than Intel, so 4.6Ghz would be like 5.1Ghz 9900K, that comparison does matter.
That article is basically 'a compilation of stuff we saw on Reddit', half of which has been debunked on the same threads.
WCCFTech suck.
Who needs benchmarks when you just know AMD is going to absolutely smash Intel's best chips! Won't even be a fair fight! Ryzen 3000 is going to play all games at 3,000 FPS in 248k Ultra 500 Hz!
Get hyyyyyyyyyyyyped!
We have chips.
Motherboard vendors have chips!
I’m saying no more!
All I will say is damn X570 can hit some mental memory clocks, 4000+ is easy with decent memory.
Soldato
But what is standard mem freq?
link?
You just need to believe. Believe!