Many thanks Bencher, for your contribution to scienceMicro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7D28 - Geekbench
Benchmark results for a Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7D28 with an Intel Core i9-12900K processor.browser.geekbench.com
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Many thanks Bencher, for your contribution to scienceMicro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7D28 - Geekbench
Benchmark results for a Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7D28 with an Intel Core i9-12900K processor.browser.geekbench.com
The only thing they need to worry is AMD not offering the support they promised, or offering it 2 years later when the CPUS are obsoleteYeah this year should be about a price war but if they are pretty similar it does make AMD pretty compelling for those buying into new system when they could have 2, 3 or even 4 year further CPU support drop in and not need to worry about anything else.
They know that from previous it will be a **** show if they do that and stated it wont be an issue again. Just haven't committed to number of years at min.The only thing they need to worry is AMD not offering the support they promised, or offering it 2 years later when the CPUS are obsolete
IMHO the last thing Intel needs is a price war. 8 big + n x little cores plus 2 coherent ring busses, IO and cache all on 10nm ain't going to be cheap to produce. They already have falling margins, so how far can they go, especially now the DC 'cash cow' has moved on to greener pastures.AMD can afford to keep prices low on Zen 4 vs Raptor lake where as Intel will likely have to raise prices because it has been made clear that they are struggling with the current generations pricing. Plus even if raptor lake ends up being faster in some gaming scenarios you have to remember that this is vs the vanilla Zen 4 chips and not the 3D-V cache versions which will likely have a huge advantage in gaming scenarios vs raptor lake
Why?Gonna get demoished in multicore by an i5 raptor with similar ipc, atleast in R20. Guess AMD will not be charging a premuim this gen, aint competition great.
According to prices leajed today Intels have raised pruces quite a bitAMD can afford to keep prices low on Zen 4 vs Raptor lake where as Intel will likely have to raise prices because it has been made clear that they are struggling with the current generations pricing. Plus even if raptor lake ends up being faster in some gaming scenarios you have to remember that this is vs the vanilla Zen 4 chips and not the 3D-V cache versions which will likely have a huge advantage in gaming scenarios vs raptor lake
Intel must be confident.According to prices leajed today Intels have raised pruces quite a bit
13900k - $725
13700k - $511
13600k - $355
Intel must be confident.
More interesting benchmarks for Zen 4 (7700X):
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is 20% faster than Ryzen 7 5800X in leaked single-core Cinebench R20 test - VideoCardz.com
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X in Cinebench R20 The first benchmark featuring AMD yet unreleased Ryzen 7000 CPU is finally here. The score AMD’s upcoming 8-core CPU known as Ryzen 7 7700X has been revealed by Extreme Player, a hardware reviewer better known for various tests of Intel unreleased CPUs...videocardz.com
About the same score as 12900K (KS is still slightly ahead). So, it looks like performance differences will come down to clockspeed.
+26% in MT, with the same core count.
If 10% of that is IPC its running at 5.4Ghz, that's 5.4Ghz Multithreaded in Cinebench.
If we consider the 5950X only runs at about 4.0Ghz MT in Cinebench and scores 26,000, with +10% IPC at 5.4Ghz the 7950X would score about 38,500.
If true i think it quite impressive how much more performance AMD have managed without changing the core count.