Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2009
- Posts
- 25,336
- Location
- Planet Earth
I think Intel really needs a good shock TBH - the Core i5 7740K thread made me remember how they literally stopped people using those 4C/8T Xeon E3 CPUs in consumer motherboards. You could literally get a £190 to £200 Core i7,plonk it in a £60 motherboard and have a good solid base for a gaming system.
What did Intel do?? They invented some "new chipset" and artificially locked the Xeons to it and blocked it from being used in most consumer socket 1151 motherboards. The socket was exactly the same though.
It meant instead of an £80 mini-ITX motherboard,if you wanted to use a Xeon E3 you needed to buy a £160 one,or just not bother and spend £300 on a Core i7 6700.
Intel have only themselves to blame if AMD gives them a shock.
Edit!!
Plus the whole part about the converting of overclocking into a costly sport when you could overclock CPUs before in the past without needing special SKUs which cost more and special expensive motherboards. I can still remember in the Core2 days,how we had £50 overclocking motherboards.
The Core i3 7350K is an example of how much Intel regards overclockers as nothing but cash cows.
What did Intel do?? They invented some "new chipset" and artificially locked the Xeons to it and blocked it from being used in most consumer socket 1151 motherboards. The socket was exactly the same though.
It meant instead of an £80 mini-ITX motherboard,if you wanted to use a Xeon E3 you needed to buy a £160 one,or just not bother and spend £300 on a Core i7 6700.
Intel have only themselves to blame if AMD gives them a shock.
Edit!!
Plus the whole part about the converting of overclocking into a costly sport when you could overclock CPUs before in the past without needing special SKUs which cost more and special expensive motherboards. I can still remember in the Core2 days,how we had £50 overclocking motherboards.
The Core i3 7350K is an example of how much Intel regards overclockers as nothing but cash cows.