Associate
Just wish there were new API's out that take great advantage of more cores/threads....oh wait....
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I don't know how you are trying to justify people spending £250 to £350 on quad cores??
What you need to understand,is if the 8C/16T SKUs are £320 onwards,that means the 6C/12T ones are going to be £200 to £300.
Where do you think the 4C/4T and 4C/8T SKUs are going to be priced??
Most people are GPU limited in games and looking at the leaked pricing for the 4C/8T models,even if AMD only hits Haswell level IPC(or a bit more) and boost clocks of about 4GHZ on the top SKU,its still preferable to the overpriced Core i5 7600K which will cost more and add the fact that most gamers don't even overclock.
Look at some game tests from an actual gaming site,like Eurogamer:
http://i.imgur.com/FW0KpFV.png
Look where an the massively hyped Core i5 7600K is even against a Core i7 4790K at a lower clockspeed?? That is with an overclocked Titan X at 1080P.
Even an overclocked IB Core i7 holds its own.
People need to get over this obsession with MOAR MHZ and benchmarks at 720P.
Great example.
The days of getting away with 4c/4t are over.
But luckily you'll now be able to get 6c/12t from AMD for the same money
Yes but it does mean that it'll boost less aggressively at stock to stay within the TDP envelope. Of course if manually overclocking it should make no difference.The lower TDP is just a factor of it being clocked lower though. It doesn't necessarily imply that it can't reach the same speeds, as it only applies at stock. To use the Phenom II X6 lineup as an example, the 1055T clocked at under 3GHz had a 95W TDP, yet you could crank it up to 4GHz just like the 125W 1100T. It really depends on how/if AMD is aggressively binning the chips or not, which we won't know for a while until people have them and we start seeing what the average overclock is.
We don't know yet what the limiting factor is for overclocking. It's possible that disabling half of the cores on an 8 core Ryzen doesn't actually improve the maximum clock speed attainable. Hopefully not though...Agreed -look at the AMD overclocking software. It seems you can selective overclock cores,meaning for lightly threaded games,you can probably get higher clockspeeds.
Agreed -look at the AMD overclocking software. It seems you can selective overclock cores,meaning for lightly threaded games,you can probably get higher clockspeeds.
The Kabylake CPUs will still have their niche as the high locking single threaded games CPU of choice, but it's funny that with one release AMD has made Intel's latest product a niche product, and pretty much made their x99 platform largely irrelevant for anyone who wants it for the prestige but mainly wants to game on it.
I just can't fathom how your going to advise someone now that buying a Kabylake chip is the better option if they are an avid gamer of all types of games.
I dunno.... I just personally think that AMD is now the smarter more obvious choice for a CPU, especially if you want maximum performance per pound spent
I fully expect to see the general forum spec me requests full of AMD CPU biased builds
8bit? lol if that's a typo - double lol if you meant it!8bit are you financed from Intel or do you work for OC?
No they don't. The X stands for XFR.
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/amd-...hz-socket-am4-processor-retail-cp-39v-am.html
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/amd-...hz-socket-am4-processor-retail-cp-39w-am.html
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/amd-...hz-socket-am4-processor-retail-cp-39x-am.html
Read the marketing gumph and it's missing on the 1700 and specifically says on both the 1800X and 1700X:
- "X" Version with automatic XFR overclocking
All three processors are the same, they all have XFR technology. The X varients have higher boost clocks hence the X, otherwise all three CPU's feature XFR and the only difference is clock speeds.
That doesn't seem to be correct. I queried it earlier in the thread and Gibbo responded withNo they don't. The X stands for XFR.
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/amd-...hz-socket-am4-processor-retail-cp-39v-am.html
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/amd-...hz-socket-am4-processor-retail-cp-39w-am.html
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/amd-...hz-socket-am4-processor-retail-cp-39x-am.html
Read the marketing gumph and it's missing on the 1700 and specifically says on both the 1800X and 1700X:
- "X" Version with automatic XFR overclocking
I did quote it earlier!All three processors are the same, they all have XFR technology. The X varients have higher boost clocks hence the X, otherwise all three CPU's feature XFR and the only difference is clock speeds.
https://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpus/2017/02/22/amd-reveals-ryzen-7-cpu-lineup-and-pricing/1AMD also confirmed that all Ryzen CPUs are unlocked for overclocking, but you'll need to wait until reviews are released to gauge the sort of speeds you can expect. On a related note, the three CPUs feature Extended Frequency Range (XFR), which, given the right thermal and power conditions, can boost the CPU past its official boost clock. Again, further details on this will need to wait until reviews go live.
sir it's 8bitS, the plural S in bit since the quantity is 88bit are you financed from Intel or do you work for OC?
sir it's 8bitS, the plural S in bit since the quantity is 8
B350 is the economy overclocking optionAh, Hell with it - I'll only end up buying it anyway when the prices are higher / stock has run out, so I guess I'll pre-order. I'm on an FX-8350 so it's going to be a major boost regardless. What's the difference between the B350 and the X370 chipsets?