Soldato
..............
Informative post, thanks.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
..............
The strap line for the conference is APU launch and updates on Polaris "and more"
Informative post, thanks.
Need more of these. Even though it is well put, haters gonna hate!
I bought my first AMD when I switched from a 500mhz Pentium 3 to a 1Ghz Athlon Thunderbird.
I didnt jump on the next AMD success with the 64-bit for whatever reason in life but I will plump for whatever is the best value CPU at the time I am buying. Same when I get GPU's.
At the end of the day if AMD cannot offer anything then its a sad market where you have to just buy intel as they are renown for not dropping to a fair price even if they dominate the market.
Well that is a strange upgrade, the FX6300 isn't really much faster than the Core 2 Quad Q6600.
So where does 40% higher IPC over their previous CPU's put them in the grand scale of things?
Impossible to tell really. We don't know what iteration of the current architecture they're using as a base for that claim. They've actually made some very decent IPC gains even on the current Bulldozer-based architecture, but they've been locked away inside budget chips that are so crippled in other ways that it's irrelevant, like the Athlon X4 845.So where does 40% higher IPC over their previous CPU's put them in the grand scale of things?
Impossible to tell really. We don't know what iteration of the current architecture they're using as a base for that claim. They've actually made some very decent IPC gains even on the current Bulldozer-based architecture, but they've been locked away inside budget chips that are so crippled in other ways that it's irrelevant, like the Athlon X4 845.