With MSI scalping their own GPUs maybe AMD figured they’d cut out the middleman (eBay) and scalp direct (TM).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c2e7/3c2e7078a9869e9d518813af2d0fa6f2837eea4d" alt="Big Grin :D :D"
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
With MSI scalping their own GPUs maybe AMD figured they’d cut out the middleman (eBay) and scalp direct (TM).
you can now get a 10850k and a motherboard for the price of a 5900X and for gaming there won't be a noticeable difference but even then it's the 6 and 8 core zen 3 parts that really offer the poor price/performance. $300 for a 6 core is 2017 pricing.I think people are forgetting that AMD can get away with a bump up in price far more easily than an equivalent Intel one, due to the fact they have a large swathe of customers who already own compatible AM4 4xx/5xx motherboards. It isn't the same as Intel raising prices for their next gen at all, with them you'd be reaching for another £100 for a motherboard too.
I think people are forgetting that AMD can get away with a bump up in price far more easily than an equivalent Intel one, due to the fact they have a large swathe of customers who already own compatible AM4 4xx/5xx motherboards. It isn't the same as Intel raising prices for their next gen at all, with them you'd be reaching for another £100 for a motherboard too.
The 5800X seems a tad expensive.
Be interesting to see if more expensive then the 3900X.
I really doubt they release next iteration on same AM4 socket.There’s murmurs of a Zen3+ in a years time so end of 2022 a year later seems to be reasonable.
BFV on DX12 is already using all cores so well that there is no CPU bottleneck. 5% improved Zen 3 over Zen 2.I was thinking about that - 3.procent in battlefield 5. Maybe it was a gpu bottleneck so the results where in margin of error?
Tests were done before 3080 became available (which it still isn't, really)Btw they used a rtx 2080ti for the gametesting. Why didn't they used the rtx 3080 or rtx 3090 to avoid possible gpu bottleneck? If the 5900x is indeed faster then using a better gpu would result more in their favor.
lolI see 1080p high refresh rate gaming popular here all of a sudden lol
Twitter is full of people complaining about the prices![]()
Twitter is full of people complaining about the prices![]()
people will always complain about prices, after all we want everything as cheap as we can get.
people will always complain about prices, after all we want everything as cheap as we can get.
Well it clearly was to much when you look at the mad clamour for the much more reasonably priced 3080.PC gaming has always carried a premium. Wonder if these are the same people that complain that a. 2080ti was too much.
Well it clearly was to much when you look at the mad clamour for the much more reasonably priced 3080.
Zen 3 is clearly AMDs Turing moment and it will cost them market share.
Well it clearly was to much when you look at the mad clamour for the much more reasonably priced 3080.
Zen 3 is clearly AMDs Turing moment and it will cost them market share.
I will "try" and get a 5900X and "try not" to get a 5950X when they're available.
The beautiful thing is with pricing is that if zero stock moves, they get lowered. Everyone wins.
Who are you trying to convince![]()
Even though AMD told gamer's nexus that the have no plans for other SKUs there's a bit of my mind thinking that holding out for a 5600 might be wise in a best bang for your buck kinda mindset ... I've got a feeling everything I want won't be stuff coming out now but in the next wave as everyone tries to compete with the new stuff, like for a gpu something like a 16GB 3070s would maybe be up my alley...