Another news agency lying through its teeth

[spoffle]

lol at the above. Just lol.

So when are you responding to Drunkenmaster's post?

 

[Nix]

Did I say that ? Read my post again. Where did I say that ? The only nonsense here is coming from you. Learn to read.

Rofl. I have a good reading comprehension thankyouverymuch.

You've been bias throughout the thread.

 

[Sliver]

Rofl. I have a good reading comprehension thankyouverymuch.

You've been bias throughout the thread.

So by supporting Israel I'm biased ?

Lets flip the script. You support Palestine, so now you're biased.

Where does this leave us ?

 

[asim18]

Hardly, just yet more rushed and shoddy journalism from organisations obsessed with being the first with the news chasing ratings. Nothing more. The media gets stuff wrong for far less exciting reasons mostly.

My deary me. A known biased and propagandist news agency publishes typical misinformation and we have a guy here who thinks it's all dandy because it was an accidental because they were just in haste to get ratings?

I mean seriously? You think if they got it right, it would boost their ratings?

Actually, why am I asking if you're serious. I've been seeing cases like this for years. It's saddening. Like that time Sky News plastered the headline "Baby Killers" on some video showing Palestinians.

Sickening how they've led people to automatically assume when they do something despicable it's just a "mistake".

 

[wildman]

So when are you responding to Drunkenmaster's post?

This Silver.........

stop dodging and answer the question, or is it a case of you can't.................

 

[[TW]Fox]

My deary me. A known biased and propagandist news agency publishes typical misinformation and we have a guy here who thinks it's all dandy because it was an accidental because they were just in haste to get ratings?

I mean seriously? You think if they got it right, it would boost their ratings?

Actually, why am I asking if you're serious. I've been seeing cases like this for years. It's saddening. Like that time Sky News plastered the headline "Baby Killers" on some video showing Palestinians.

Sickening how they've led people to automatically assume when they do something despicable it's just a "mistake".

I never said it was acceptable, i said the reason for it is probably far more mundane than some of you think it is.

 

[spoffle]

Rofl. I have a good reading comprehension thankyouverymuch.

You've been biased throughout the thread.

You either have a bias, or you are biased. Rather than you are bias.

 

[Dr Who]

The Arabs started the conflict.

The Jews had a sovereign claim to a homeland which was sanctioned by the UN and the allies following WW2. Had the Arabs not immediately attacked them in the first place, we might well not see the mayhem we see today. The Arabs made the first move of aggression.

Let's not listen to that drivel and confuse it with the facts. Let's listen to some undisputed facts, from Jewish people.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y58njT2oXfE

Israel and Palestine should both exist, one shouldn't be destroying the other in a desperate land grab. Why do they want Gaza? Oooh maybe the natural gas deposits there?

Let's also not forget that Israel didn't start air strikes because of rocket attacks, the rocket attacks started AFTER the air strikes.

Now, let us imagine this is Northern Ireland, why does the 4th most powerful military in the world need to use air strikes on Palestine? Is that the way we dealt with the IRA? What would the world have said if we did use those methods? What about South Africa? What would the world have said about air strikes on black townships to eliminate Mandela and the ANC?

We have to get real here folks, terrorists are a fraction of the population in the most densely populated area in the world. These air strikes are pure weapons of terror to break the Palestinian's will. Israel is the terrorist here and the cleverest thing they have done is to fool the world into sympathising with them.