Another school shooting in the US

Errol, why do the army use high powered, semi-automatic firearms and not just knives and swords?

A) Because they are cool and go bang
B) They match the overall look better
C) They are much more effective at killing numerous people in a short amount of time
 
Last edited:
If someone walked into a classroom filled with kids with a gun, i imagine anyone in that room wouldnt stand much of a chance, which so many cruel past events show.

I imagine its a different story with a knife. I'm almost certain we'd not see 20 kids brutally murdered :( Maybe 1 unfortunate teacher defending her\his pupils :(
 
Where did you dig that up from ? An assault rifle is defined by its ammunition and magazine type, not its fire rate. Assault rifles can be auto or semi auto. The M16A2 which is standard issue to the US marine core is semi auto only. Its not a fully automatic weapon. The fact its standard issue says theres nothing civilian about it.

You have to consider what the implications of having guns like this for sale legally are.

http://www.thenation.com/article/17...rs-ar-15-most-popular-assault-weapon-america#

Does it not strike you as slightly wrong that these type of weapons are freely available at walmart (Like our Asda / Tesco) with ammunition to match. Is it any wonder that America has a gun problem when semi automatic rifles are for sale at your local supermarket ?

You're getting confused between assault rifle and assault weapon.

An assault rifle is a specific term used for weapons with a select fire capability.

Just to add, the M16A2 is selectable between semi auto and 3 round burst which replaced full auto. This is still regarded as automatic as it fires 3 rounds on one pull of the trigger, rather than one for one as per semi. The rifle is still select fire.
 
Last edited:
Solution = teaching 90% of the population to carry guns and be prepared to use them against criminals.

I agree that firearms education is vital, but it is by no means a panacea and if you think it is it simply highlights your naivety. Plus, arming a citizen does not turn him or her into Robocop. In high-stress, unexpected situations people hesitate, freeze, cower and run away - even when carrying guns. This was discussed by the readers of a popular firearms blog with seasoned professionals agreeing that even if a 'concealed-carrier' is present during a shooting, robbery or whatever, he or she might very well hide under a table.
 
Well this society deems the economic and social benefits of driving to outweigh the risks of the deaths they cause. The US on the other hand feel that the deaths of 2 to 3 dozen kids on average per year is a price worth paying for the "freedom" to own assault rifles.

Perfectly put!
 
I wonder why Erol think the US Marines primarily use high powered firearms instead of just knives (which would be much cheaper).

Eroll is playing devil's advocate, or just holds an immature view towards guns with lines like "MP7 is not available to buy in the US. Which is a shame. That's what I would want to buy if I lived there."

Just got done playing Call of Duty Eroll?
 
What do you do then when, once guns are banned, there are massive spates of knife mass murders? Ban knives?

Or do you think that everyone would start being nice to each other suddenly?

Once again, your logic is not sound.

School mass shootings are more common than school mass stabbings for one main reason. A gun is far far more effective at killing.

Shall we consider the UK, where guns are fairly hard to come by, how many school mass stabbings have we've had? And have they been as fatal as comparable school shootings (say in the US)?

But let's not let logic get in the way of your argument shall we :rolleyes:
 
O.M.G.!

And these people wish to be taken seriously?

How is a video game that simulates murdering people any different than a game that simulates raping people? Like they said fantasy violence is a form of porn.

Should rape games be allowed, and available to kids?
 
Once again, your logic is not sound.

School mass shootings are more common than school mass stabbings for one main reason. A gun is far far more effective at killing.

Shall we consider the UK, where guns are fairly hard to come by, how many school mass stabbings have we've had? And have they been as fatal as comparable school shootings (say in the US)?

But let's not let logic get in the way of your argument shall we :rolleyes:

Stabbing people isn't glamourized like shooting people though is it. If we made thousands of video games, movies and songs that glamourized and fantasized the stabbing of people, then exposed kids to thousands of hours of it, I think you'd see a ton more stabbings.

If the media made guns and shooting as mundane, boring and lame as possible instead of being fetishized through fantasy violence, we'd see much less psychos trying to live out the fantasy.
 
Just heard on the news that some people think it would be better if they armed the Teachers, I think the phrase they like to use is "The only person who can take a gun from a bad man is a good man with a gun"
 
"The only person who can take a gun from a bad man is a good man with a gun"

I think they have watched too many Hollywood films, and then who takes out the "good guy" if he goes crazy? Anyone who wants to go shoot school kids won't need to take their own guns just disarm the guard and use his.
 
Just heard on the news that some people think it would be better if they armed the Teachers, I think the phrase they like to use is "The only person who can take a gun from a bad man is a good man with a gun"


Maybe a locked gun cabinet in the staffroom and a member of staff being fully trained to use it isn't a bad idea. Better than being completely defenceless when something like this happens.

"The only person who can take a gun from a bad man is a good man with a gun"

I think they have watched too many Hollywood films, and then who takes out the "good guy" if he goes crazy? Anyone who wants to go shoot school kids won't need to take their own guns just disarm the guard and use his.

I personally think the kind of people who do this only feel powerful when they have a gun in their hands. I doubt they would have the courage to try and disarm a security guard to get his handgun. I doubt if they tried they would be successful anyway and even if they were, they would have 15 shots or so? Usually they fire hundred of shots.

It has to be better than being defenceless when this sort of thing seems to be on the rise.
 
Last edited:
"The only person who can take a gun from a bad man is a good man with a gun"

I think they have watched too many Hollywood films, and then who takes out the "good guy" if he goes crazy? Anyone who wants to go shoot school kids won't need to take their own guns just disarm the guard and use his.

Is that what you'd do if you ever found yourself in proximity to a gun? "oooh I just cant help myself I have to shoot everybody with it!!!"
 
Back
Top Bottom