I do wonder if religion just went would the nutters find something else or would it be at least tempered Down?
With the old "afterlife" thing being a pretty big boon, it's quite the motivator.
I'm not sure, but overall I do feel the world would be a better place without religion. Well, at least the contentious ones.
I don't think your one sided explanation actually...explains the issue here, assuming that by saying Cultists you do of course mean Muslims.
Do you think when large groups of Muslims came in the 60s they were just as eager to kill people? Do you think the equation is perhaps "religion + x + y= terrorism "?
Can you please stop saying "religion" when in 99.9% of cases it is Islam, and by cases I mean a terrorist murdering an innocent civilian in Western Europe. I think in this particular case we have people taking retribution for a book being burned on completely separate individuals who's only crime was to be from Sweden, so the X or Y would be "Islam+freedom of expression = terrorist murder", so I'd suggest Islam isn't compatible with Western values, if it were a political ideology we'd just ban it, which would be the sensible thing to do.
Last night was with a friend, and before this attack happened we were talking how the world would be a much better place without religion in it, as it just causes conflicts.
But yea getting rid of Islam would be a great starting point, can't stand it.
The problem is Islam’s Sky Pixie Handbook saying it’s absolutely dandy to do horrific things to non-believers.In recent history, that may be the case, however it rather overlooks that the IRA spent a great deal of time conducting a terror campaign right here in the UK.
ETA was also a terrorist group that conducted multiple attacks on Spanish soil and I'm fairly certain they did not follow Islam (although I am not certain, my google fu failed me)
But to try and paint a picture that "99.9% of terrorism cases" it is Islam, is far from truth.
I would go as far as to say that 99.9% of Muslim's are not conducting terror attacks, are part of a terrorist organization or dream of killing people because of their religious beliefs.
The problem is Extremism.
I think you'll struggle to find someone willing to blow themselves up over a trade deal or incorrect pronouns..
Yugoslavia worked just fine when Tito was running the place. Some regions need a moderately benign dictator to hold them together.Even if you got rid of Religion it would still be the same. Humans have a evolutionary trait deep down inside them where different cultures do not mix.
Yugoslavia never worked. It tried to merge different religions and cultures together. Look what happened.
It is happening all over Europe now.
Yugoslavia worked just fine when Tito was running the place. Some regions need a moderately benign dictator to hold them together.
In recent history, that may be the case, however it rather overlooks that the IRA spent a great deal of time conducting a terror campaign right here in the UK.
ETA was also a terrorist group that conducted multiple attacks on Spanish soil and I'm fairly certain they did not follow Islam (although I am not certain, my google fu failed me)
But to try and paint a picture that "99.9% of terrorism cases" it is Islam, is far from truth.
I would go as far as to say that 99.9% of Muslim's are not conducting terror attacks, are part of a terrorist organization or dream of killing people because of their religious beliefs.
The problem is Extremism.
Why can't the terrorists just take out politicians?
Would require a certain level of competency that most of them don’t have. Much easier to just kill Joe bloggs on the street who has no security detail etc
and other Sky Pixies Handbook do not say the same thing?The problem is Islam’s Sky Pixie Handbook saying it’s absolutely dandy to do horrific things to non-believers.