Man of Honour
- Joined
- 16 May 2005
- Posts
- 31,297
- Location
- Manchester
Good stuff. Not sure I'd be bothered about "wasting" a bag in that case data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc608/fc608ab6e6dc2469165c10f9a8cb020731d10c69" alt="Smile :) :)"
However, I do think pan searing a steak gets better results than using a blow torch. Though I tend to do both - cast iron pan and Searzall.
Tbh with steak, unless it's a really decent thick cut of it, I'll often just do in a pan. It's easy enough to get very good results and less faff.
If I've planned my cooking better I'm more likely to use sous-vide. I'm all about the best results for the least active cooking time so there are definitely times sous-vide wins easily and others where it isn't quite so great. A good example is the cases where braising is often a better choice - lamb neck and ox cheek for instance.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc608/fc608ab6e6dc2469165c10f9a8cb020731d10c69" alt="Smile :) :)"
However, I do think pan searing a steak gets better results than using a blow torch. Though I tend to do both - cast iron pan and Searzall.
Tbh with steak, unless it's a really decent thick cut of it, I'll often just do in a pan. It's easy enough to get very good results and less faff.
If I've planned my cooking better I'm more likely to use sous-vide. I'm all about the best results for the least active cooking time so there are definitely times sous-vide wins easily and others where it isn't quite so great. A good example is the cases where braising is often a better choice - lamb neck and ox cheek for instance.