'Anti' Isalm cartoons....

Spawn said:
This can only end up being more worse, personally i think the whole damn issue of free speech has got out of hand...i think you lot have made your point....further printing or provocation of this matter will only make things worse imho.

If it were moderate opinion then perhaps further printing wouldn't be neccessary - but what we have here is a battle of wills - extremists have threatened us on the basis of our opinion. Our opinion is our own, they should have no control. Muslims should have input to our opinion, but what has ringed loudest so far has been threats. Because of this, it is imperative for both Western society and non-extremist Muslims (because extremists need to control moderates as well) to promote uninhibited free speech, regardless of any threat.

Those that would surrender their freedoms for security, do not deserve the freedoms in the first place. Selah.
 
Phantom said:
why would He cut off their heads? it was never reported that he ever did or told anyone to do that...
Cultural stereotypes are such a bad thing, especially when they're true
BBCi
A minister in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh, Haji Yaqub, announces a $11m reward for anyone who beheads the cartoonist who drew the images of Muhammad.
 
Sleepy said:
Cultural stereotypes are such a bad thing, especially when they're true

taken from the article:
A radical Islamic leader has been detained in Pakistan to prevent him from leading protests against cartoons satirising the Prophet Muhammad.

definition of radical: (1). Favouring or effecting fundamental or revolutionary changes in current practices, conditions, or institutions: radical political views. (2). Departing markedly from the usual or customary; extreme:
 
Last edited:
Phantom said:
definition of radical: (1). Favouring or effecting fundamental or revolutionary changes in current practices, conditions, or institutions: radical political views. (2). Departing markedly from the usual or customary; extreme:
But the description of the cleric you quoted is not the same individual as I referred to in my post.
 
Back
Top Bottom