Any religious people watch the Wonders of Life last night?

I think its because you assert that what you say is the truth, when observation shows different. None of us know to the nth degree exactly what happened in the beginning. No one has all the answers.

To presume that you do, simply based upon nothing more than you believe that you do is hardly an educated starting point for the basis of any 'debate'

Maybe one day you will accept that no corroborated scientific theory does not automatically mean that god did it. It just means we don't know how or why...yet.
 
Angillion accuses anyone who doesn't agree with his viewpoint a liar. :rolleyes:

That is not true, like almost everything you write.

There are many people who don't agree with my viewpoint on various things. Few of them are lying.

What I have done is pointed out where you and others like you have made provably, objectively, unequivocally untrue statements. When someone makes such a statement, there are a very limited number of possibilities:

1) They know that the statement they have made is untrue.
2) They think that it is true when it isn't because they think they have seen (or heard, etc), things that never happened.
3) They think that it is true when it isn't because they are not aware of the evidence and do not understand the subject.

In other words, the only possibilities are lying, delusion and hallucination or ignorance.

I have already explained this. It's not difficult to understand. I haven't said anyone is a liar - I have said that one of the possible explanations is the correct one.

If ignorance is not possible (e.g. when you falsely claimed that every atheist in this thread had emphatically stated "God does not exist"), then the only remaining possibilities are lying or delusion and hallucination.

You're upset because you think that being a theist gives you a right to a free pass to make false statements and have everyone believe them. By pointing out your false statements and making it clear that I don't believe them, I've gone against what you see as your right. So you reply with another false statement, another false accusation. You have nothing else - you can't provide a counter-argument because I'm right and you know it.

What is your education level, Angillion?
Adequate for the subject, unlike yours.
 
I am merely stating that these keyboard warriors wouldn't insult me in person, thus proving themselves to be cowards. If you wouldn't say something in person to someone then you shouldn't say it on 'net., either.

They've PROVEN themselves to be cowards?

Religious logic at it's finest.
 
Evolution-SC.jpg


life-by-chance.jpg

Evolution by natural selection is NOT a random process.

Abiogenesis is NOT a random process.
 
I have just started a indroduction course in Astrobiology this week, and a question came up which states some things.

Origins of life.

1:Some Supernatural or divine intervention.

2:Originated elsewhere.

3:Originated Earth.

Please explain jesus heads what you think of that question.
 
In what way is arguing against something that you don't believe in strange behaviour?

I don't believe Mcdonalds is good for people, but I don't go telling them they're wrong for eating from there. I just, you know, let them get on with it. Perhaps you should do the same?
 
I don't believe Mcdonalds is good for people, but I don't go telling them they're wrong for eating from there. I just, you know, let them get on with it. Perhaps you should do the same?

Says the person who keeps arguing that evolution doesn't exist.
 
I don't believe Mcdonalds is good for people, but I don't go telling them they're wrong for eating from there. I just, you know, let them get on with it. Perhaps you should do the same?

Why don't you believe McDonalds is good for people? Did God inform your belief? Or was it based on science maybe?

You should take your own advice.
 
Atheism and Religion are but two sides of the same coin.

One prefers to use its head, while the other relies on tales.
 
Back
Top Bottom