Anyone know when Intel's SSDs are appearing?

The default block size for an ICH9R.

I'll be testing the two SSD's against a pair of SAS drives later, all running off a nice 8 port SAS card, so will do some stat collecting then. :)
 
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/productlist.php?groupid=701&catid=14&subid=910

just out of curiosity, why such a huge price difference between the samsung 64GB and the OCZ 64GB? i am seriously considering a 32GB drive just for the heck of it or maybe two in raid 0.

The samsung doesn't state it's SATAII perhaps.

One limitation of the initial generation is that it's a PATA-SATA I bridged so the transfer rates suffered and they were beaten by normal HDDs. The SATA II have shown better transfer rates and return better rates compared to notebook drives although drives such as the F1 seem still to sustain a very good transfer rate.
 
The reviews of the OCZ model I've seen are identical to the Samsung model, it even has the Samsung part number on the back of it.

Edit: Saying that, a quick check of it shows they actually reviewed the SATA-1 model.
 
Finally some solid progress on the HDD front - as in the article, hopefully Intel wading in will spark the market and get some decent price/performance products in the SSD market. Even the small ones would be great for OS/Scratch disks! (Bet superfetch will love them as well!)
 
Back
Top Bottom