Associate
gord said:Doesnt have a camera, and therefore, wont be superseeding my Sony Ericssons..
When it does have a decent camera its all i will need!
http://www.apple.com/
It does have a camera.
pffft beaten ><
gord said:Doesnt have a camera, and therefore, wont be superseeding my Sony Ericssons..
When it does have a decent camera its all i will need!
gord said:Doesnt have a camera, and therefore, wont be superseeding my Sony Ericssons..
When it does have a decent camera its all i will need!
But it has a camera .Duradrum said:True. No camera is a bad idea. Eveyone expects a camera on a high end phone.
This phone becomes much more attractive!Phnom_Penh said:Yes it does, it has a 2mp one on the back .
Apple also state that the standard 30GB iPod is capable of 14 hours of audio playback, as opposed to the 16 hours the iPhone is claimed to be capable of.starscream said:Although this looks awesome....
5 hours battery life using apps, 16 audio, and these are the manufactures specs as well, so probably in optimised conditions.
Although this is great for PDA type device, as a phone, it is going to be a bit of a pain if it needs charging at least once a day.
Al Vallario said:This is an absolutely killer wireless device, though. The wireless functionality and software (Widgets just like OS X, Safari web browsing, beautiful contact list system, conversation-style SMS messages, photo viewer, video viewing, iPod-like music playing interface) combined with the 4/8GB hard drive makes it the best companion you could possibly imagine if you're on the move. Plus it's 11.6mm thin, has three proximity detectors, an ambient light sensor, a huge touch-screen with unbelievablely smooth multitouch functionality...
It's not a replacement for the iPod, it's a separate device which puts the iPod to shame and does so in style
ChoÞÞer said:rrrr there nice, i bet apple will be replacein a lot of these phone's due to the screen breakin