• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Apple locks NVidia GPUs out of new operating system Mojave

"Established" tech sites very often spread lies / as well as get money/products from nvidia.

Was waiting that reply. They also for the most part fully explain their testing so it is possible to reproduce - there might well be some bias with some of them and/or avoiding areas to show a product in a better light but when they do straight up tests like this if they fudged the numbers other people would be very quick to pick them up on it.
 
apple to push their own gpus over the next few years?

or tim cook to rummage down the back of the sofa for some spare change and buy AMD . what would it cost to buy AMD lock stock and barrel? 30 billion dollars on a good day? apple has 10 times that sitting in cold hard cash
 
apple to push their own gpus over the next few years?

or tim cook to rummage down the back of the sofa for some spare change and buy AMD . what would it cost to buy AMD lock stock and barrel? 30 billion dollars on a good day? apple has 10 times that sitting in cold hard cash

Would be interesting if Apple moved on AMD's GPU side - I don't think they would though unless there was enough money in it for them to pretty much remove AMD from the PC graphics space - I can't see them having an interest in maintaining GPUs for Windows systems.
 
Would be interesting if Apple moved on AMD's GPU side - I don't think they would though unless there was enough money in it for them to pretty much remove AMD from the PC graphics space - I can't see them having an interest in maintaining GPUs for Windows systems.

Forget it. :D :D
 
Would be interesting if Apple moved on AMD's GPU side - I don't think they would though unless there was enough money in it for them to pretty much remove AMD from the PC graphics space - I can't see them having an interest in maintaining GPUs for Windows systems.

Apple used to make their own hardware and it was rubbish. I doubt they want to go back to it.
 
you guys do realise AMDs current market cap is in the region of 20 billion? add a chunk on to tempt shareholders and AMD could easily go to apple for 25-30 billion.

can imagine it would be a good option for apple to have a tame cpu/gpu manufacturer under its wing. how it would affect amds other stuff like consoles and the desktop computer market who knows but would be a serious worry for both Nvidia and intel if AMD suddenly had access to apples wealth and backing. maybe the plans to use arm based processors to replace intel chips by 2020 isnt going as planned and this would give them a drop in option for both cpu and gpu and a wealth of tech and knowledge on hand for other stuff like phones and tablet chips dev
 
you guys do realise AMDs current market cap is in the region of 20 billion? add a chunk on to tempt shareholders and AMD could easily go to apple for 25-30 billion.

can imagine it would be a good option for apple to have a tame cpu/gpu manufacturer under its wing. how it would affect amds other stuff like consoles and the desktop computer market who knows but would be a serious worry for both Nvidia and intel if AMD suddenly had access to apples wealth and backing. maybe the plans to use arm based processors to replace intel chips by 2020 isnt going as planned and this would give them a drop in option for both cpu and gpu and a wealth of tech and knowledge on hand for other stuff like phones and tablet chips dev

You do realise that AMD will never be sold, right? It is not a matter of financial resources but a matter of legal constraints and opportunities. It is currently illegal for anyone to buy AMD off.
 
You have a small number of individual/small channel YouTubers claiming that - against established tech sites/channels like Gamers Nexus, Hardware Unboxed, etc. that not only show a different picture but have even gone as far as to debunk those videos from smaller channels claiming otherwise (as per the one I linked).

I mean on one of those videos you linked like the 3rd comment down or something links to a video that thoroughly dismisses its claims with vigorous testing.

Hardware Unboxed did a video 'GTX 780 How the mighty has fallen' to show how the 290/390 outperformed it in modern games on high settings but in a recent video they showed the 780 actually held it's own and edged it out on medium settings.

Not that any of that is to do with 'gimping drivers' necessarily.
 
Well that bust your theory straight away, didn't it. :p

What are you talking about. I said in my post how it went. The release 2080 driver gimped the 1080ti and a later driver gave the 1080ti the performance back. Maybe you should try reading.

From what i have seen and heard around here. The gimping driver just so happened to be the release driver for the 2080. So in reviews the 1080ti took a performance hit to make the 2080 look that much better. Users have said they regained the performance back in later drivers. It's very underhanded but also smart as the initial reviews are what people look at and mainly where people get there performance impressions. So Nvidia made the 2080 look better than what it is against the 1080ti and then gave the performance back later.
 
What are you talking about. I said in my post how it went. The release 2080 driver gimped the 1080ti and a later driver gave the 1080ti the performance back. Maybe you should try reading.

So, performance was affected in a single driver, and Nvidia subsequently rectified the issue. How is that gimping drivers? That's a software bug.
 
Hardware Unboxed did a video 'GTX 780 How the mighty has fallen' to show how the 290/390 outperformed it in modern games on high settings but in a recent video they showed the 780 actually held it's own and edged it out on medium settings.

Not that any of that is to do with 'gimping drivers' necessarily.

780 is a complicated one and I've rarely seen reviewers get numbers that compare to actual use of the cards - there is also a potential ~20% difference between the A1 stepping cores and later B1s.

The 700 series cards were/are quite broken in various Vulkan benchmarks as well so for awhile if things like Doom factored heavily in the benchmark results they could suffer - more recently Doom is less prominent in testing and the Vulkan support has been improved a bit (though still not great on the 700 series) which has helped them to pick up a bit of ground in cumulative testing.
 
Back
Top Bottom