Apple vs Samsung, court orders Samsung to show Apple 5 new phones

Doubtful anything will come of it though. Nokia need MS to help save them with the WP8 phone. MS and Apple are in bed together (for now).
 
This is what their actions have bought. An incredible amount of scrutiny. People are going to be watching and judging them by the measure that they have been judging everyone else.
 
Ummm here :confused:

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft...tion-on-nortel-patents-anti-competitive/10271

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20...oll-armed-with-thousands-nortel-patents.shtml

Also, Apple and MS have a cross licensing agreements just now but, interestingly, Apple ensured there were conditions to stop MS from simply releasing iPhone/iPad clones yet Apple now do similar...

That means nothing at all. A large consortium purchased those, its far more than those two companies. Both have Tge rights to use them.
All companies purchase rights.

So again what are you on about? How are they in bed together.

Are apple and samsung in bed with each other? As Samsung supplies apple?

Oh and it's not interesting at all that ms have apple patents but aren't allowed to make a clone. That's a common sense clause.
 
Last edited:
2l9jccx.jpg
 
Is that advert any different from what other companies do e.g. Asda when they do the comparison with other supermarkets on their TV ads?
 
Does it matter what lawyers say? The only important thing is what courts say and so far they have all been very clear on what FRAND means and it's a legal obligation to follow it. So lawyers adj oters can keep saying it mean nothing and/or isn't defend. But Untill they get a win in court then it essentially is defined and set in law.

As to trying to sell patents to get around it that has been tried and failed.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom