Are earnings too low / living costs getting too high??

Philip Green's salary is not relevant, which is why any sensible person would quote the median rather than the mean... and the figures being thrown about in this thread are median figures.

exactly I quoted the median figure for full time workers and the other poster started bitching about agendas etc..
 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_Equivalised_Income_Distribution.png

A picture paints a thousand words.
All three average measures are important, the idea that 27k per individual in a 2 person household is a good representation however is laughable.

By the way Philip Green's salary is on those graphs along with our notional BnQ workers.

I'm not sure it is - 'his' businesses belong to his wife and she resides in Monaco.

"All three average measures are important, the idea that 27k per individual in a 2 person household is a good representation however is laughable."

a representation of what exactly?

What exactly are you discussing or trying to represent and why are you using 10 year old data?
 
The average salary UK for the tax year ending 5 April 2015 was £27,600. This is a median average and an increase of 1.6% over the 2014 median average which was £27,200. These averages are for full time employees with data taken from the ONS Annual Average Salary Survey. I used something called Google which I found after doing a search on Yahoo, which was linked to me via Altavista.
 
I'm not sure it is - 'his' businesses belong to his wife and she resides in Monaco.

"All three average measures are important, the idea that 27k per individual in a 2 person household is a good representation however is laughable."

a representation of what exactly?

What exactly are you discussing or trying to represent and why are you using 10 year old data?

Did you look a the wikipedia household income graph, it was 2015, here is 2016.

Explain why you believe presenting 27k per person is more representative?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/10/UK_Equivalised_Income_Distribution.png
 
2 people earning the median wage should quite easily be able to afford a £200K property once they have a 10% deposit together.

however they won't be able to buy new BMW's every 3 years, go on luxury holidays every 3 months, etc. but they should have a comfortable lifestyle, so long as they aren't stupid with their money.

changing from buying the latest iphone every year to a moto G and a giffgaff sim for instance would save the average person £600 a year per person, which would be their mortgage paid for 2 months with the savings.
 
I have sky full package, a premium car on finance, i always buy designer clothes and am very comfortable with my finances. I rent with my wife, i earn a slightly above average wage, my wife is not as high an earner as me, we do not struggle, we manage to save about £1k per month without sacrificing anything, i pay £500 / month in maintenance for my children, plus buy treat them and buy things for them (naturally). We still have spare money every month to treat ourselves to a night away or something. Living in the north does help, but i have noticed a bigger gap now between earnings and the price of property but it isn't as bad up north as it is down south, i guess if you want to live in a premium area (city centre / affluent area) it will cost you, however, i do live in one of the best postcodes in the country (CA20), but do not pay a premium for it.

Things could be much worse than they are here, for example, i'm moving to New Zealand at the end of this year, now, you can get property for £20k over there, but it is literally miles and miles from anywhere, like a tiny village where there is no work or prospects, if you want work, you need to move towards Wellingotn / Auckland, where you will find work, when i go, i'll be expecting a salary of around $60/$65k pa. Not brilliant, but not bad right? Well, it is peanuts when you look at the cost of housing in Auckland, the cheapest house currently on the market within commuting distance to Auckland is $298k (£170k), this is for a 2 bed shed....

http://www.realestate.co.nz/2968238

This is about 60 miles to Auckland CBD, any closer and you're looking at $600 / 700k for a similar property. (£340-£400k). Even rentals start around $450 per WEEK for a poorly maintained property with single glazed windows etc. The point is, the gap between pay and property is much, much worse there.

The ironic thing is though, i've got more of a chance of buying a property over in NZ than i do here! They have a thing called a kiwisaver over there, where you pay so much of your wage into it a month (between 3-8%), and you can use this to buy your first property, as well as your pension pot, i think this is a fantastic idea, and should be brought in over here too.

Kiwisaver is indeed a good idea. However, you've had to be paying in for 3 years before allowing the funds to be used for your first property.

The earning numbers you quoted aren't great for living in cities, if I'm perfectly honest. Not if you want to be driving your BMW, coming home to a full Sky package and wear designer clothes. But, it's all relative. You can probably do all those things on 65k or whatever, but you won't have much change left at the end of the month.

However, it's no use talking to me about these things because I'm an ultra-obsessive saver and frugaleer. I refuse to buy things in VIDEO GAMES if I believe them to be too expensive or not enough value for money. So while you could probably live of what you've mentioned above, you'd be cutting it close for savings, in my opinion that is. Your financial tolerances might be different though.

House prices in NZ is out of control. I could write pages and pages on that. The only big city they're seemingly stable and remotely sensible is Christchurch. Wellington and Auckland is a giant casino and even in remote little dumpy Dunedin they suddenly have ideas that a 200k pile of leaky crap is worth twice its price.

Anyway, good luck with the move and keep us up to date. I made the move 3 years ago and still trying to decide whether it's been a good idea or not :)
 
It's very easy to blame the poor for their poverty.

It means that not only can you stop looking for solutions to poverty, you can justify not sharing what you have with those less fortunate.

"I'm not paying more tax to help the poor. If they just (worked harder/ gave up Sky/ stopped living beyond their means/ got a degree) they would not be poor! It's not *my* fault!"

Meanwhile, look at the situation with food banks. The number of people - in this country - now dependent on food banks to feed their families is rising drastically every month.

As I said, it would be nice if they could be HONEST for once, why they're struggling. Screeching at 'bankers' or 'the rich' or unfairness of life is sadly being ignored by reflex. As if all of us don't have the same issues.

You point to the food bank, I ask what went wrong that they have to resort to such measures. I can name situation after situation where people made stupid and idiotic financial decisions that landed them in strife, despite a whole mountain of good advise. Some of those are bankrupt, some of those are on the edge of bankruptcy, some have recovered and are making a slew of new stupid financial mistakes. I'm sure you can provide ample situations that show the opposite.

Obviously there's going to be clear cut cases where despite your utmost efforts, you just don't earn enough. That's obviously a problem that need addressing and I'll be happy to help anyone in such a situation. I'm actually sorta helping someone right now. Not financially, but teaching good financial sense and advice. 19yo kid we've taken on as an apprentice. Typical case, from a financially broke and clueless household. I'd imagine the type that rail against 'the rich' and visit food banks. He was complaining about not having enough money by the end of the week. I've offered to help him look at his finances, we've made a few adjustments which I'm holding him against on a daily basis until it becomes 2nd nature. To date he's managed to save about 2k. The kid is taking it super serious now that he's seeing some results. On a salary that's not far off minimum wage.

He would've been another lost case with his hand out had someone not sat him down, taught him some basic financial literacy and common sense. I think they biggest area we're failing the poor is not teaching them how to work with money. You can keep giving them money which won't help if not put to good and intelligent use.

Until we can have an open and frank conversation about terrible financial literacy and common sense in this and other 1st world countries, the problems won't go away.
 
Interested in why you buy second hand clothes. Designer gear IMO isn't that expensive if you buy in the sales. It also lasts longer usually. Or why not just buy from cheaper stores? I mean M & S, Next, H & M, etc aren't expensive at all IMO for clothes.

Never used to, but I started after realizing that a lot of the stuff I've seen in there are brand new or worn-once type clothes. Used to live next to a Salvation Army shop and got to know some of the volunteers in there. All of them buy their clothes there now. Most of my clothes are actually designer stuff, but only 2nd hand bought. Probably worn no more than your average 'new' clothes being tried on in store about 10+ times by others.
 
Ok, I'll give a bit of background. I earn enough that my wife is taking a year out to study. So it's not single income as such. The point remains: why is it that I can earn in the 80somethingth centile for an individual but only have house buying power in the 4th centile? It is absurd that the house market is so vastly inflated and out of step with people's earnings.

Agreed.

The housing market is doing massive damage to society and I think many things, such as mental illness, family breakdowns, financial issues, relationships breakdowns can find its roots in the housing market. If not directly, indirectly.

Here in NZ it's not enough that the market is essentially a massive casino when buying, it's also totally out of whack when it comes to rentals. Speaking to people at work about how hard they're finding it even trying to rent an overpriced POS here in Wellington or Auckland.

I've sold my place in Christchurch and we're just renting now until we've decided what we want to do (back to UK or staying on), but we've had to up our budget for renting tremendously just to get as little competition as possible. We got incredibly lucky on a place that had about 25+ offers from other prospective tenants. Just stupidly lucky for the price we're paying. But I'm not forgetting the fact that there's 25+ other good people out there that missed out and possibly still living in uncertain circumstances, trying to get a place of their own. All the while the entire market is treated as a cash cow.
 
Can I tell all of you something I've noticed from personal experience. It's anecdotal, but you might be able to agree with me anyhow.

The people most likely to have credit card debts, loans, and vast outgoings are... those earning substantially above nat min wage.

I know people who earn twice as much as me, but who are continually borrowing money, have credit cards, and appear to live hand-to-mouth. Always saying how money is tight. Yet have two cars, holidays abroad, etc. They really struggle to balance the books, and have *enormous* outgoings. But they earn very good money.

I also know people earning nat min wage who *don't* have Sky, don't take holidays, buy cheap clothes, can't afford anything, and are really, really tight (good) with their money.

When people say "you could be so much better off if you didn't waste your money" it is often true - but think about the people you know who actually do live like this. I'll bet you they aren't the lowest paid in society. I'll bet you they are either students, or they are middle-class people earning average UK wage or more.

I put it to all of you that many people earning nat min wage are very good at controlling their expenditure. They have no choice.


I see your point, but i know many people who you say who are min wage, who just awful with their money. They spend it quicker then they earn it and living well beyond there means. I am sure there many others like you said who have no choice and good with their money.
But you are right about the majority of people who live like that way are those who are earning substantially above nat min wage. I know many people like this, 2 nice cars on the drive that they can't afford, credit card bills they stress out about month to month and barely able to go food shopping without using a credit card. I am sitting next one just like that at the mo at work.
 
Kiwisaver is indeed a good idea. However, you've had to be paying in for 3 years before allowing the funds to be used for your first property.

The earning numbers you quoted aren't great for living in cities, if I'm perfectly honest. Not if you want to be driving your BMW, coming home to a full Sky package and wear designer clothes. But, it's all relative. You can probably do all those things on 65k or whatever, but you won't have much change left at the end of the month.

However, it's no use talking to me about these things because I'm an ultra-obsessive saver and frugaleer. I refuse to buy things in VIDEO GAMES if I believe them to be too expensive or not enough value for money. So while you could probably live of what you've mentioned above, you'd be cutting it close for savings, in my opinion that is. Your financial tolerances might be different though.

House prices in NZ is out of control. I could write pages and pages on that. The only big city they're seemingly stable and remotely sensible is Christchurch. Wellington and Auckland is a giant casino and even in remote little dumpy Dunedin they suddenly have ideas that a 200k pile of leaky crap is worth twice its price.

Anyway, good luck with the move and keep us up to date. I made the move 3 years ago and still trying to decide whether it's been a good idea or not :)

I guess we're lucky because we'll move into the granny flat at my wifes parents house in Whangaparaoa whilst we save and decide whether we want to stay on the peninsula or move out to Tauranga or wherever. As a chef, $65k seems to be a decent wage and on a par with here in the UK at my level. My wife will be earning too and we should have an annual salary of about $110k between us all going well. My wife also has a kiwi saver which she's had for about 12 years with a nice little chunk in it too so she can use that straight away if we find a decent house. It's just a matter of fainding a balance of a decent job and a relatively affordable property. I worked out that if we had a joint income of $95k (underestimated), we could afford around $550k for a house, which still buys hardly anything on the peninsula, however, i'd love a renovation project.
 
House prices and rental prices are ridiculous, no-one can argue against that. But it’s the same for everyone.


Myself and my partner are relatively young (23 & 22) and we wanted to get on the housing ladder but still have plenty of month ‘left over’ a month in order to have the ‘luxuries’ mentioned in this thread. This means a significant deposit in order to reduce your borrowing amount and therefore interest rates, making buying a house more affordable.


The only way we could get the deposit was to use any skills we had to earn extra money on top of our main jobs. This meant almost a year and half with the equivalent of 2 full time jobs, staying up until 2-3AM and working all weekend. But we did it.


I guess what im saying is, everybody is in the same boat. If you want it bad enough, you can make it happen. It may take a lot of time and hard work but it is possible. But only if you’re willing to put the effort in!
 
Please explain this.

What do you suggest one do instead? Rent? Then what do you suggest they do when they retire? How do you expect them to pay £600+ a month on state pension? As well as all other costs.

What your suggesting is idiotic
actually i think it's not that idiotic, however quite a lot of changes will need to happen for it to become viable. Do i have answers on what needs to change? no ;)
I was born in Germany and have lived in Switzerland for long periods and both countries rely on most people renting and it works (but also their pensions work differently).
 
Back
Top Bottom