Are people today too susceptible to group pressure?

I have noticed that "apartheid" is the new in word of the week.

Used by terrorist sympathisers?

Human Rights Watch recently released a report warning Israel that they have crossed the line regarding separate laws for Palestinians living in Israel and occupied Palestinian territories. Whilst I cannot sympathise with Hamas, terrorism is an inevitable action when people have no recourse to fair law.
 
To answer the Q, no, it's the same as it ever was imo. Though millions of folk are now influenced by invisible online friends.
 
Human Rights Watch recently released a report warning Israel that they have crossed the line regarding separate laws for Palestinians living in Israel and occupied Palestinian territories. Whilst I cannot sympathise with Hamas, terrorism is an inevitable action when people have no recourse to fair law.

What did Human Rights Watch say about Hamas/Palestine?

Are non-muslims welcome there?
 
Human Rights Watch recently released a report warning Israel that they have crossed the line regarding separate laws for Palestinians living in Israel and occupied Palestinian territories. Whilst I cannot sympathise with Hamas, terrorism is an inevitable action when people have no recourse to fair law.
How does that work? I thought Gaza and the West Bank were Palestinian governed but that Israel unilaterally maintained the border and flight controls. Israel doesn't administer the justice system in Gaza or the West Bank does it?
 
Do you have a source that is not heavily biased against jewish people and answers the questions?
Most of my life I have been very sympathetic to Jewish people and the State of Israel, but the policies by their government need to be examined. The government Israel should not be above criticism. I grew up in South Africa and witnessed first hand the implications of creating second class citizens.

Other sources

Amnesty
https://www.amnesty.org/en/countrie...-israel-and-occupied-palestinian-territories/
Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...-israel-and-apartheid-prophecy-or-description
 
Human Rights Watch recently released a report warning Israel that they have crossed the line regarding separate laws for Palestinians living in Israel and occupied Palestinian territories. Whilst I cannot sympathise with Hamas, terrorism is an inevitable action when people have no recourse to fair law.

Separate laws for Muslims already exist, or tell me why exactly we have Sharia courts in Britain?
 
Separate laws for Muslims already exist, or tell me why exactly we have Sharia courts in Britain?
There are not separate laws, but there are Muslim Arbitration Courts which act as arbiters, but under framework of English law
Wiki
The MAT operates under Section 1 of the Arbitration Act which states that: “the parties should be free to agree how their disputes are resolved, subject only to such safeguards as are necessary in the public interest”.[5] As such it operates within the framework of English law and does not constitute a separate Islamic legal system. Under the Act they are deemed to be "arbitration tribunals".[4][dead link]

The Muslim Arbitration Tribunal has no powers to grant a divorce which is valid in English and Welsh law.[5][6] A talaq can be granted to recognise divorce.[5][6] A sharia marriage has no bearing on personal status under UK law.[7] The Muslim Arbitration Tribunal has no jurisdiction on criminal matters but can attempt reconciliation between spouses.
 
There are not separate laws, but there are Muslim Arbitration Courts which act as arbiters, but under framework of English law
Wiki

So its mostly just pretend laws so they can feel like they are still being oppressed in Saudi Arabia?

It is what a lot of Muslims want anyway, I'd have no issue with implementing separate full Sharia Law in the UK for Muslims only, as long as they can choose to opt out of it.
 
So its mostly just pretend laws so they can feel like they are still being oppressed in Saudi Arabia?

It is what a lot of Muslims want anyway, I'd have no issue with implementing separate full Sharia Law in the UK for Muslims only, as long as they can choose to opt out of it.
The only religious court that has legal standing in the UK is the Church of England ecclesiastical courts. There are a number of religious arbitration services dealing in divorce, family matters and financial matters between parties, but all have to follow UK laws.

Quote and link from the independent review into the application of sharia law in England and Wales
Arbitration Arbitration is a form of private dispute resolution which takes place outside of the formal court room. The parties enter into an agreement under which they appoint an arbitrator to adjudicate on their dispute. In doing so they agree to be bound by the decision of the arbitrator. Under English family law the parties cannot make an agreement that purports to exclude the power of the court to make its own orders. Arbitration in family law disputes does now have a formal and established status in the application of domestic civil law.
https://assets.publishing.service.g...CPFG_Report_into_Sharia_Law_in_the_UK_WEB.pdf
 
Sure, why not? He's clearly addicted to the attention and has to keep the media and celebrities in the US happy. He's become a total tool.
 
Sure, why not? He's clearly addicted to the attention and has to keep the media and celebrities in the US happy. He's become a total tool.

On the one hand I agree, he has disassociated himself from the Royal Family and seems to be doing nothing apart from chasing the lights and money using his name. His new "mental health" project being one way to help rake in the cash.

However, one cannot deny his mental health has also been hugely affected by the death of this mother and the media attention/causation. And often some of the best and most active advocates for mental health are those that have experience of having their own negatively affected.

I am kind of concerned that Meghan just exploits this part of him for her own gain though, and as Harry ages he'll just become a whimpering, snivelling, irrelevant shadow of his former self while she goes from strength to strength.

Is this the same Apple that relies on child labour and slavery?

Do they?
 
Back
Top Bottom