No, I think the world would be a better place if people understood where their facts ended and faith started. If you want to declare evolution true or factual, lock stock and barrel, it can only be done on faith. Science does not and never has dealt with truth, it deals with prediction, to be exact, the simplest prediction that can generate the given data.
You cannot present the mechanism for evolution as fact, because it is not. The observed data could be regarded as factual, but you cannot claim you know how that data occured, you can only theorise and predict. Anyone who presents evolution as fact is wrong, and not very scientific.
Nothing in evolution precludes the existance or involvement of a higher being, unless you place faith in the predicted mechanism as being more likely than any other, even though it's only gained it's place through the assumptions of the method that derived it.