Likewise
Well, at least I know when to realise that the joke is not funny any more
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Likewise
Well, at least I know when to realise that the joke is not funny any more
oh, ok, so please tell everyone here who are running those clocks, to overclock more. Please. FFS, if your precious nvidia clocks much higher, why would everyone run this bench at minimum(according to you) overclocks?
They are free to unleash the power of overclocking aren't they?
Fury oced? at stock voltages? please
All I'm saying is that 1400-1450mhz is as easy an overclock to attain on a 980Ti than 1100mhz is on a Fury.
Either way ignoring overclocks.. what happened to AMD's "DX12 advantage"? from what we've been hearing constantly this past 2 weeks about asynchronous shaders and how AMD will gain massively from DirectX 12 compared to NVidia, here we are with the first user benchmarks and it's pretty much the status quo so far with Fury 20% slower at 1080P and probably only closing the gap at higher resolutions. I think most 980Ti users were probably preparing for their cards to be 50% slower in this game with everything they've been hearing the past couple of weeks.
oh, ok, so please tell everyone here who are running those clocks, to overclock more. Please. FFS, if your precious nvidia clocks much higher, why would everyone run this bench at minimum(according to you) overclocks?
They are free to unleash the power of overclocking aren't they?
Fury oced? at stock voltages? please
Most can't run their TX's much higher than 1450MHz on air without throttling or putting in loads of voltage. If they could they wouldn't be running or benching at 1400MHZ.
I think it says a lot when a FuryX at 1100MHz is matching a TX at 1350MHz.
My 980Ti hits 1450Mhz on stock volts other 980Tis can get hit 1500Mhz on stock volts. Its not hard at all to hit these sort of clocks without touching the voltage.
My 980Ti hits 1450Mhz on stock volts other 980Tis can get hit 1500Mhz on stock volts. Its not hard at all to hit these sort of clocks without touching the voltage.
My 980Ti can do 1545MHz on stock volts, but it didn't like doing two runs back to back
1560 with a bit of voltage added was a lot more stable.
Is this game actually good? I wouldn't really want to pay $45 for something just for a couple of benches.
My 980Ti can do 1545MHz on stock volts, but it didn't like doing two runs back to back
1560 with a bit of voltage added was a lot more stable.
Is this game actually good? I wouldn't really want to pay $45 for something just for a couple of benches.
But is it bench stable though? Or is it like one of those CPU overclock skyhigh, boot into windows to take a screenshot, and then be done with it?One of my Ti's hits 1570Mhz but I don't like to run the FuryX boys noses in it
But is it bench stable though? Or is it like one of those CPU overclock skyhigh, boot into windows to take a screenshot, and then be done with it?
Also is the default cooler actually capable of maintaining those speed without throttling? Or do people have to spend extra on coolings for those speed?
Different apps seem to be more or less stable. Ashes seems to frequently crash but at lower temps / useage than Heaven or Fire strike. I can do 1550 for Heaven but the best I've managed on ashes was 1503 which was a lower score than 1480. (If I set my fan to 100% my GPU doesn't go over about 60C)