-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Ashes of the Singularity Coming, with DX12 Benchmark in thread.
- Thread starter humbug
- Start date
Sorry, my mistake, it was posted in the other AoS thread:
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/223654-instrument-error-amd-fcat-and-ashes-of-the-singularity
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/223654-instrument-error-amd-fcat-and-ashes-of-the-singularity
Greg, next time try reading this thread more carefully
guru3D has no clue that FCAT does not support dx12 correctly.
There is an article on extremetech explaining this. There is no stutter on single or dual GPUs from AMD. period
All good and I just thought it was interesting. I even posted what AMD had to say about it but AMD are Vsync locked, which does produce stutter but if you can't see it, happy days
All good and I just thought it was interesting. I even posted what AMD had to say about it but AMD are Vsync locked, which does produce stutter but if you can't see it, happy days
on single GPU there was some slowdowns on my fury x, from time to time, but I am very sensitive to lower than 60fps. But with 2x fury x it was butter smooth.
I just read the Extremetech article and some solid points. Take what your eyes see really and if you don't see any stutter, happy happy
Just been reading this article from Guru3D when looking for comparison vids to check IQ and some interesting facts have cropped up and I don't think the AMD boys will like it
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_page...larity_directx_12_benchmark_ii_review,11.html
[/SPOILER]
Stutter city for AMD
Maybe you forgot to read this bit...
Reading the article I suspect the Nvidia boys should be more upset. The AMD results are limited by Vsync being enabled so theoretically the results can be higher than the current tests.
There is no mention of stutter except for the 980-980ti dual gpu test they did so your dig at AMD is unfounded and shows your Nvidia bias again. The AMD cards are showing the large but consistent frametimes in FCAT because of Vsync being forced in the benchmark. It does not show any problems in the game but only in the FCAT measurement.
AMD already stated that Radeon Software 16.1 / 16.2 does not support a DirectFlip in DX12, which is mandatory to solve to this specific situation/measurement. AMD intends to resolve this issue in a future driver update. Once that happens we'll revisit FCAT.
Read the following article if you don't understand what FCAT is doing with AMD results:
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/223654-instrument-error-amd-fcat-and-ashes-of-the-singularity
edit: many posters beat me to it by the time I finished typing this up.
Last edited:
Ahem...you were saying?
Just been reading this article from Guru3D when looking for comparison vids to check IQ and some interesting facts have cropped up and I don't think the AMD boys will like it
Stutter city for AMD
Ahem...you were saying?
What part about I admit I read it wrong do you not understand? Look at my previous posts in this thread and then look at your own. You are barking massively up the wrong tree by calling me bias!
Thanks. I read it and assumed FCAT was working like it was for NVidia but after reading the Extremetech article, I can see I was wrong and hands up. I also misread what message AMD sent over to Guru3D and yer, I am having a bad day
Only when I intend to record for a review or show performance on my Youtube channel, otherwise I don't even bother overclocking or having any overlay running except for ShadowPlay.
You are saying that I start some fanboy argument but in your own post you say "AMD boys" hence my rolleyes. Let's call it quits now.
Focus on the game bloom effect difference which is a big change judging by the old version video I referenced.
I posted up my video and linked to a tech video - Feel free to dissect both and see what is what. I bet the guy who did that video that you keep repeatedly posting and bringing up made a mistake (which is easily done).
Interesting energy efficiency test by tomshardware.de
Energy efficiency Watts / fps on 980/980Ti and Fury X are on same level, 390x is far behind.
http://www.tomshardware.de/ashes-of...tx-12-dx12-gaming,testberichte-242049.html#p5
Energy efficiency Watts / fps on 980/980Ti and Fury X are on same level, 390x is far behind.
http://www.tomshardware.de/ashes-of...tx-12-dx12-gaming,testberichte-242049.html#p5
Interesting energy efficiency test by tomshardware.de
Energy efficiency Watts / fps on 980/980Ti and Fury X are on same level, 390x is far behind.
http://www.tomshardware.de/ashes-of...tx-12-dx12-gaming,testberichte-242049.html#p5
after being busted about FCAT - again , they are trying for a shred of professionalism now - THG have been caught before not updating results when new cards come out (for older cards) or using certain sample size for their own ends
Interesting energy efficiency test by tomshardware.de
Energy efficiency Watts / fps on 980/980Ti and Fury X are on same level, 390x is far behind.
http://www.tomshardware.de/ashes-of...tx-12-dx12-gaming,testberichte-242049.html#p5
Does anyone seriously look at efficiency when playing a game? lol
The Async Shaders are hardware units in the AMD cards so use more power as you would expect. Kind of confirms that the Nvidia Async is not hardware if power consumption doesn't change much. Is Async even functioning on Nvidia cards though?
Last edited:
Isn't Maxwell 2's superior power efficieny always on the table when there is nerdfights happening between nvidia and amd fanboys. In every single forum. This just proofs that Fiji is just as power efficient than maxwell when properly fed.
And no, nobody cares about power efficieny while playing
Still interesting read.