He's doing the direct opposite. You and others like you are working on assumptions. You've even admitted you are!
Not at all. I am only interested in discussing why the conversation (as it was transcribed) was deemed as racist, as that is all there is really to discuss.
No, we can never know exactly what happened or what was said in a factual sense with undeniable proof. But if you go down that route, then there is no real discussion to be had.
Whether the transcript was correct, NF's personality, what she has done afterwards, The Palace's imagined thoughts or motives, SH's imagined thoughts or motives, what randoms on twitter think about it etc etc, is all noise to try and deflect away from the only important part of the whole topic.
Last edited: