Lewis to win championship by 5 points and Ferrari regret not getting Kimi to give Vettel second place.
Lewis to win championship by 5 points and Ferrari regret not getting Kimi to give Vettel second place.
The Mercedes choice was odd. I'm surprised Mercedes don't have a team deciding that if x happens at any given point, then they should do y (obviously other factors could come into play, but with the resources and hundreds of staff they have it seems odd they don't have a basic plan for any given moment).
Same. I don't bother with these threads during race weekends, but it's hilarious reading on a Monday morning finding the fickle morons whose opinions completely change from Saturday afternoon to Sunday.Personally I now find it hilarious, and often wait till the race has ended before checking the thread to watch the flip flopping and toys coming out of the pram
Same. I don't bother with these threads during race weekends, but it's hilarious reading on a Monday morning finding the fickle morons whose opinions completely change from Saturday afternoon to Sunday.
even if hamilton won i would have still voted the same. maybe less actually as hamilton(im a fan) would stay on 1st throughout the race. him having a blow out what gave this race an extra point or two for entertainmentThe best bit is looking at the race ratings. Look who voted it a 10 .
If Lewis won, you can guarantee those would be 1's.
It is kind of sad to vote solely based on whether you favorite driver did well or not/ your most hated driver had a bad day or not.
When I put together the stats thread it was interesting to see how binary some votes have become, i.e. races 18 months ago were rated low but hardly 1 or high (and hardly 10). Lately it seems like people are using the all-or-nothing approach to vote which skews the results.The best bit is looking at the race ratings. Look who voted it a 10 .
If Lewis won, you can guarantee those would be 1's.
It is kind of sad to vote solely based on whether you favorite driver did well or not/ your most hated driver had a bad day or not.
When I put together the stats thread it was interesting to see how binary some votes have become, i.e. races 18 months ago were rated low but hardly 1 or high (and hardly 10). Lately it seems like people are using the all-or-nothing approach to vote which skews the results.
I deliberately didn't name and shame but there is an obvious pattern there
I think you should name and shame - all the data's public anyway, it is just a case of someone consolidating it all together!
When I put together the stats thread it was interesting to see how binary some votes have become, i.e. races 18 months ago were rated low but hardly 1 or high (and hardly 10). Lately it seems like people are using the all-or-nothing approach to vote which skews the results.
Fixed that for youOnce you realise this, and ignore them, they will usually go away to watchsimpler sports more suited to shorter attention spansactual racing like motogp or btcc
Fixed that for you
Simpler = better most of the time which is something F1 needs to realise. The fact the commentators have to explain the rules 2 or 3 times per race shows how over-complicated it is.
I get that and that's why I've been sticking with it but F1 still needs actual racing. It's getting to the point where qualifying is the highlight of the weekend.F1 is not meant to be simple. I love the complexity and levels of detail available to pour over.
If you want crash bang wallop racing its in the tin tops and bikes. F1 is a more nuanced and technical sport and that side of it is what appeals to me.
F1 is not meant to be simple.
F1 has always been more nuanced and technical if you wanted it to be, but now it needs to be a whole lot more in order to appeal. You dismiss MotoGP as crash bang wallop but there's just as much technology and detail as there is in F1 if you want to look for it, it is more accessible and the racing is so much better.