B550 or X570?

Associate
OP
Joined
6 Sep 2020
Posts
65
Take a look at the ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER if you register within 30 days you get 5 year warranty instead if 3 years.

thanks, I have ordered the msi 1660 super. It has gddr6 checked the zotac and it only had gddr5. Thanks for your help. They might have 3080's in stock later next year LOL
 
Associate
Joined
14 Feb 2009
Posts
68
Except they cost more than a MSI MEG X570 Unify right now, which itself is a non-RGB variant of the MSI ACE retailing at £330, and a lot more than the Tommahawk X570

What are they actually offering here for the customer that X570 doesn't do already incl. price points?
Was about to ask this question. Why even go for x570 at this point? Is there a catch I'm missing somewhere?
 
Associate
Joined
21 Apr 2007
Posts
2,494
Was about to ask this question. Why even go for x570 at this point? Is there a catch I'm missing somewhere?
well B550 was supposed to be the value oriented PCIe4 alternative to X570 it benefits from not needing a chjpset fan but otherwise is restricted on the number of PCIe4 lanes it has to share. There are some really good B550 boards but they are more expensive than many of the X570 ones now they are coming down in price. :eek:

£ for £ B550 vs X570 you'd go with X570 surely, at least decent VRMs and cooling.
 
Associate
Joined
14 Feb 2009
Posts
68
well B550 was supposed to be the value oriented PCIe4 alternative to X570 it benefits from not needing a chjpset fan but otherwise is restricted on the number of PCIe4 lanes it has to share. There are some really good B550 boards but they are more expensive than many of the X570 ones now they are coming down in price. :eek:

£ for £ B550 vs X570 you'd go with X570 surely, at least decent VRMs and cooling.
So If I am interpreting this correctly, overclocking is tad bit more limited on the B550 no matter how high-end it might be?
 
Associate
Joined
21 Apr 2007
Posts
2,494
So If I am interpreting this correctly, overclocking is tad bit more limited on the B550 no matter how high-end it might be?
No not necessarily, the B550 has less PCIe 4 lanes in its arsenal and CPU to chipset is PCIe 3. Where it starts to make a difference is connecting lots of cards, storage and peripherals... If say you only ever want to use 1x GPU and 1 x M.2 storage you wouldn't notice the difference but go higher than that the compromises on how B550 divides up the lanes starts to creep in.

For good overclock potential you basically need a £200+ board atm as that gives you the quality components that gives you the best chance for higher frequencies but also better cooling (less crashing). The Unify for example uses (I believe) a superior VRM controller to the Tomahawk that might make a difference or it may not.

I'd look at the MSI Tomahawk, Unify and the Gigabyte Aurous Elite. The new boards recently announced my MSI and Asus I think are all £280-£350, if you shop around you might get a Unify for £250. One thing the reviews don't tend to cover or have changed over time is the Unify price has come down from £300 to £260 and the Tomahawk has gone up £210+ due to its popularity.... so the lines are blurring. If you are on a budget Tomahawk is where I'd put my money, if you want more you pay more...
 
Soldato
Joined
15 Oct 2019
Posts
11,824
Location
Uk
No not necessarily, the B550 has less PCIe 4 lanes in its arsenal and CPU to chipset is PCIe 3. Where it starts to make a difference is connecting lots of cards, storage and peripherals... If say you only ever want to use 1x GPU and 1 x M.2 storage you wouldn't notice the difference but go higher than that the compromises on how B550 divides up the lanes starts to creep in.

For good overclock potential you basically need a £200+ board atm as that gives you the quality components that gives you the best chance for higher frequencies but also better cooling (less crashing). The Unify for example uses (I believe) a superior VRM controller to the Tomahawk that might make a difference or it may not.

I'd look at the MSI Tomahawk, Unify and the Gigabyte Aurous Elite. The new boards recently announced my MSI and Asus I think are all £280-£350, if you shop around you might get a Unify for £250. One thing the reviews don't tend to cover or have changed over time is the Unify price has come down from £300 to £260 and the Tomahawk has gone up £210+ due to its popularity.... so the lines are blurring. If you are on a budget Tomahawk is where I'd put my money, if you want more you pay more...
The tomahawk slightly outperforms the unify in VRM temps but that said they are both great boards.

 
Associate
Joined
21 Apr 2007
Posts
2,494
The tomahawk slightly outperforms the unify in VRM temps but that said they are both great boards.

VRM temps are both good, on the Unify you have extra M.2, extra PCIe x16 slot, better VRM controller, bluetooth 5.1, OC cmos reset, post code LEDs etc... Basically if you're intending to tinker, push the OC's and experiment with bios versions or believe you'll end up with 3 M.2 storage then the Unify has you covered that's what you are paying for. Does it mean extra performance? Probably not it means you can push for the extra performance and there are some nice bios updates on the Overclockers.net forums

Unify is the better board for a higher price just as the Godlike, Ultra and Extreme are better still but for an even higher price.
 
Soldato
Joined
24 Apr 2006
Posts
6,363
Location
SE England
VRM temps are both good, on the Unify you have extra M.2, extra PCIe x16 slot, better VRM controller, bluetooth 5.1, OC cmos reset, post code LEDs etc... Basically if you're intending to tinker, push the OC's and experiment with bios versions or believe you'll end up with 3 M.2 storage then the Unify has you covered that's what you are paying for. Does it mean extra performance? Probably not it means you can push for the extra performance and there are some nice bios updates on the Overclockers.net forums

Unify is the better board for a higher price just as the Godlike, Ultra and Extreme are better still but for an even higher price.

Are these custom BIOS updates? Can you point me in the direction of them please.

Tomahawk has bluetooth 5.1 just to point out.
 
Associate
Joined
14 Feb 2009
Posts
68
Thanks for the suggestions, I'm really liking the unify but not sure with MSI in the long term, I do highly prefer Gigabyte so I think I will also look at those, but they do seem to be more expensive.
 
Associate
Joined
21 Apr 2007
Posts
2,494
Soldato
Joined
14 Nov 2002
Posts
4,309
So back to the OPs original question.
I am considering a Tomahawk, but am still on the fence as to B550 or X570 version.
VRM wise they are the same, I don't need the wifi and I only have one NvME for OS which is gen 3 anyways. Main storage is currently a hybrid 2tb, but may in time get updated to an SSD.
I will look to be running a Zen 3.
Considering not many people can even tell the difference in sata SSD to NvME in a blind test and the cost difference is £50, what am I missing out on by going for the 550 ?
 
Man of Honour
Joined
23 Mar 2011
Posts
16,975
Location
West Side
So back to the OPs original question.
I am considering a Tomahawk, but am still on the fence as to B550 or X570 version.
VRM wise they are the same, I don't need the wifi and I only have one NvME for OS which is gen 3 anyways. Main storage is currently a hybrid 2tb, but may in time get updated to an SSD.
I will look to be running a Zen 3.
Considering not many people can even tell the difference in sata SSD to NvME in a blind test and the cost difference is £50, what am I missing out on by going for the 550 ?
X570 have extra pcie lanes and more ports.

https://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/3582-amd-chipset-differences-b550-vs-x570-b450-x470-zen-3
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Nov 2002
Posts
4,309
Which , as far as I can see, makes no odds to my setup.
Ill only be using one M2 and one sata, or at most 2 m.2 and 2 sata in the future, no add in cards apart from GPU.
I'll have 2 less USB 3.2 ports on the back,, but I am sure hubs will be available when more 3.2 devices become mainstream.

In terms of overclockability (if the new cpus even have much headroom) there won't be much, if any difference as the 2 tomahawk boards use the same vrms and have essentially the same memory oc speeds (again probably irrelevant as likely tied to the cpu).

Is that a fair assessment, or am I missing something ?
 
Man of Honour
Joined
23 Mar 2011
Posts
16,975
Location
West Side
Which , as far as I can see, makes no odds to my setup.
Ill only be using one M2 and one sata, or at most 2 m.2 and 2 sata in the future, no add in cards apart from GPU.
I'll have 2 less USB 3.2 ports on the back,, but I am sure hubs will be available when more 3.2 devices become mainstream.

In terms of overclockability (if the new cpus even have much headroom) there won't be much, if any difference as the 2 tomahawk boards use the same vrms and have essentially the same memory oc speeds (again probably irrelevant as likely tied to the cpu).

Is that a fair assessment, or am I missing something ?
Yes that's correct.
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Nov 2002
Posts
4,309
Cool thanks.
I may as well save myself £50 and avoid a potential point of failure/noise in future (chipset fan) and go with a B550 :)
 
Back
Top Bottom