he didnt run enough in china to find out
you know damn well he didnt.. look at the sector times... look at drs usage....
did merc pay benneton? did they pay ferrari?
they paid for one race and from one qualifying session he was in the sport off his own back at a time when it wasnt easy to drive a car casually because the tyres demanded it
schumacher and alonso would be in a team without any sponsors other people like maldando , senna , petrov etc wouldnt as they have very little to offer other than the money they bring
Does that sentence make any sense to anyone else?
There has been plenty of variation in strategy's this year, if MS did not mess up his qual he would not be whinging.
But what has this got to do with Schumacher complaining about the tyres?
i dont know? mr men came ou with
"Did Merc pay for MS to make his Jordan debut, yes or no? "
you nolonger need skill to drive an f1 car with these tyres and all the pay drivers are just confirming it.
Only the back two teams have not complained about tires all the rest have.
MSC is 100% correct you can't race with these tires at all, now it's 90% tires 5% driver 5% car it's just stupid.
Now if they had brigdestone back and keep DRS and Kers drivers could push their cars no problem. I don't call tire management F1 racing.
Only the back two teams have not complained about tires all the rest have.
MSC is 100% correct you can't race with these tires at all, now it's 90% tires 5% driver 5% car it's just stupid.
Now if they had brigdestone back and keep DRS and Kers drivers could push their cars no problem. I don't call tire management F1 racing.
It was also interesting to hear Mercedes' Michael Schumacher complain about the Pirelli tyres.
He is a professional racing driver, and it's all about looking after your tyres. You do that by getting the right balance on the car.
When I was involved with Bridgestone tyres with Jaguar in the early 2000s, in the middle of the tyre war with Michelin, Schumacher and Ferrari had tyres we were not even allowed to look at.
They cost so much money that Bridgestone could not afford to supply them to everyone. And whenever we did have an opportunity to run a derivative of those tyres, our lap times were much, much better.
It's a bit sad that Michael now sees things the other way around, because a lot of his competitiveness in those days was down to the working relationship he and Ferrari had with Bridgestone, one to which nobody else had access.
Now there's a standard tyre, it's down to him and Mercedes to get it working properly, not point the finger at the supplier.
Snip.
It's been about tyres for many many years,).
But then pitstops become pointless. Everyone qualifies on the softs, runs 10 laps, pits for the hards, and then drives to the end of the race. The Bridgestones made for stale racing as you need cars to be on different strategies to mix things up.
Prost employed a smooth, relaxed style behind the wheel, deliberately modeling himself on personal heroes like Jackie Stewart and Jim Clark. He was nicknamed "The Professor" for his intellectual approach to competition. Skilled at setting up his car for race conditions, Prost would often conserve his brakes and tyres early on in a race, leaving them fresher for a challenge at the end.
Are these not the same tyres as last year, just with the compounds moved around? ie last year's medium is now this years hard?
What other F1 drivers have said anything?
Senna v Prost, tyres crucial no? So even back then tyres were needing to be managed in racing.