Another point.
What is people's opinion on Kimi?
Did he really do that well in the last race?
If you look at his rookie team-mate, he finished 7 seconds behind Kimi.
From 11th to 2nd, nah not all that good
Another point.
What is people's opinion on Kimi?
Did he really do that well in the last race?
If you look at his rookie team-mate, he finished 7 seconds behind Kimi.
kimis good but i think the renault is a very quick car this year.Another point.
What is people's opinion on Kimi?
Did he really do that well in the last race?
If you look at his rookie team-mate, he finished 7 seconds behind Kimi.
If you look at the team-mate battles:
Vettel finished about 39s ahead of Webber (RBR should thank their lucky stars they have Vettel)
Rosberg finished 16s ahead of his team-mate (MSc did well, considering he qualified so far behind)
Alonso finished 7s ahead of his team-mate (bear in mind that this is Massa's strongest track).
So, given the above, did Kimi really do "that" well OR was the Renault just a very quick car in Bahrain?
Martin Brundle said:In eight days we have had two great races largely driven by the degradation and resultant strategy dilemmas around the Pirelli tyres. In our show I expressed an opinion that whilst I'm really enjoying the races I wouldn't want F1 to become only about the tyres. I hadn't realised that Michael Schumacher was about to launch a broadside at the difficulty of managing the narrow window of performance and the high drop off of the tyre grip.
On the journey home I was talking with two F1 drivers, a world champion and a multiple race winner, and they had very similar concerns to Michael in that they can't push the cars anywhere near their limits. 'Physically my granny could drive the race' quipped one to underline how far away from the limits they are.
Pirelli have done a great job for F1 and judging by audience figures and comments the fans love this style of unpredictable racing. But it does become confusing when we have drivers popping up out of the blue with a fast but unrepeatable lap time in a session, and fancied runners simply disappearing backwards in the race. We need to see pure skill, speed and pace win through too, and not simply just applaud those who could tip toe the best or find the right set-up sweetspot on the day. There is room for both.
You cant really believe that can you? If they are watching F1 no doubt theyll have heard the commentators mentioning how these tyres are made to brief.Surely Pirelli are going to be concerned about bad press for their brand if F1 drivers are saying the tyres are no good? I know they have been asked to produce this type of tyre, But the general public and press will take it as they are ****
You cant really believe that can you? If they are watching F1 no doubt theyll have heard the commentators mentioning how these tyres are made to brief.
Love to see links to any negative press about their road tyres due to how their F1 tyres are performing if you have them? Be shockingly poor journalism...
ps3ud0
You cant really believe that can you? If they are watching F1 no doubt theyll have heard the commentators mentioning how these tyres are made to brief.
Love to see links to any negative press about their road tyres due to how their F1 tyres are performing if you have them? Be shockingly poor journalism...
ps3ud0
It has turned into a bit of "who can go the fastest yet easiest on their tyres in each of the driver's stints"...
There's nothing particularly wrong with this and it is the case for virtually all racing, however, it's problamatic now because you are having to manage your tires as soon as you put them on. We need a situation where you can at least afford to do 10 very fast laps before you impact your race significantly. If they do more than 1 or 2 fast laps (in order to overtake) they start to significantly damage their tyres.