Man of Honour
Bottas clearly wanted to be the hero and get infront of a Mercedes but he just got carried away. He was entitled to take the gap but not at that speed, it was never gonna stop.
Watching the race live I thought that Bottas had been harshly dealt with, particularly as the incident was in the melee of the start where normally anything goes. Hamilton left too big a gap, looking to swing back from very wide to get a better drive off the corner than Rosberg (which may well have worked if he'd gotten a better start and there weren't so many cars close behind him).
Calling a merc 1, 2.
Called it in the first race, calling it in the second race as well
I called it again though! Thats 100% so far (not hard though)Calling a merc 1, 2.
Called it in the first race, calling it in the second race as well
I called it again though! Thats 100% so far (not hard though)
Erm...hate to break it to you but kimi came second.
I do think the penalty was a little harsh though, I would have rather have seen Bottas have a time added pit stop rather than a drive through.
I think Bottas was at fault, but we've seen so much go unpunished at the start of the races under the idea that it's essentially expected, so was strange to see Bottas get the drive through...
Nico Rosberg rather than Lewis Hamilton would have claimed pole position had the proposal been in place for Bahrain.
The German's two fastest laps in Q3 were quicker when combined than his team-mate's, who was only fourth fastest after the first runs after an error at the final corner. Ferrari's Sebastian Vettel would also have qualified ahead of Hamilton in second.
Absolutely agree with Seb - this aggregate system would be complete ****.
It would really eff up Hamilton as well - he often does a pretty crap first lap in qually then goes beast mode on the final lap of q3.
how would it? they dont base qualifying on average lap times, they based on who got the quickest single lap .
what am i missing from your statement?