*** Battlefield 1 ***
- Thread starter TonyTurbo78
- Start date
That was my guess - either that or some sort of old school life vest. It doesn't look futuristic at all in my opinion.
Maybe I'm just seeing what I want to see.
The past is dead and buried doesnt need to be revisited. Boring crap just like all this future space stuff. Cod 4 remaster will do me just fine and il replay bf 3 and 4 lol
Nope dnt no what IRL Server is
Last edited:
Who are you and what have you done with bf4 westie?
Let's hope it's a reskinned late edition of bf4 rather than a release version then.
I agree with myni, if they reskin anything let it be late versions of bf4 and not that poop BFH battlefront is made of...
Westie dropping bombs here and he will be playing too for sure. Outside is for console plebs and noobs
Trench coat and Zeppelin was my take, but is the youtuber an official mouthpiece for EA or is it just an elaborate troll again?
If it turns out to be Eastern front, then it seems the rebuff-al vid was the elaborate troll trying to cover a real leak.
I'm wondering what titan mode would be like where the titan is a zeppelin, and you've got spitfires and Messerschmitts dog fighting all around it. Or god forbid zeppelin assault (AKA BF walker assault reskin).
Anyway today we get answers!
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 10 Nov 2006
- Posts
- 8,564
- Location
- Lincolnshire
Seems like Battlefield was in my life such a long time ago, with the disappointment to find out it was crappy Starwars last year and the flop of Hardline the year before I'm really hoping this will be game of the year for me. Please Please get this right.
Suspended
- Joined
- 22 Apr 2015
- Posts
- 2,634
I can not wait!!!!!!!!!
Red Alert style, that's a Zeppelin flying over a new yorker
Soldato
- Joined
- 10 Nov 2006
- Posts
- 8,564
- Location
- Lincolnshire
As long as we get guns I can relate to (real life) I'll be happy.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2008
- Posts
- 25,079
- Location
- Lorville - Hurston
ffs i would take a reskined bf4 over a pathetic COD game.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 8 Jan 2010
- Posts
- 10,263
- Location
- UK
Same **** different skin... Summer is here go outside
I can see that you're using your youtube moniez to impress the honeyz
No idea how people come to the conclusion that it will be WW 1 or 2 just because of that teaser clip, it could be anything 
But it most likely will be WW 1 or 2 era.
In terms of a marketing decision, it would be stupid to have "another" modern/future shooter as it won't stand out from the rest and as shown by the majority here, myself included, people are bored sick of modern warfare shooters now.
For marketing and sales purposes, it make the most sense to be WW 1 or 2 era, as if people want a AAA modern warfare or future shooter game, they can choose from countless COD titles, titanfall, battlefront, planetside 2 and even the other current BF games (BF 3, 4 and hardline) for that "fix" but... if people want a WW style shooter, what AAA game is there for them to choose from? Afaik, none so DICE/EA will have that market demographic all to themselves as people have nowhere else to go, which = lots of money.
Personally I think a future style shooter could be done quite well though, just because it is set in the future doesn't mean you need to have jet packs, lock on bullets etc.
But it most likely will be WW 1 or 2 era.
In terms of a marketing decision, it would be stupid to have "another" modern/future shooter as it won't stand out from the rest and as shown by the majority here, myself included, people are bored sick of modern warfare shooters now.
For marketing and sales purposes, it make the most sense to be WW 1 or 2 era, as if people want a AAA modern warfare or future shooter game, they can choose from countless COD titles, titanfall, battlefront, planetside 2 and even the other current BF games (BF 3, 4 and hardline) for that "fix" but... if people want a WW style shooter, what AAA game is there for them to choose from? Afaik, none so DICE/EA will have that market demographic all to themselves as people have nowhere else to go, which = lots of money.
Personally I think a future style shooter could be done quite well though, just because it is set in the future doesn't mean you need to have jet packs, lock on bullets etc.
Last edited:
No idea how people come to the conclusion that it will be WW 1 or 2 just because of that teaser clip, it could be anything
But it most likely will be WW 1 or 2 era.
In terms of a marketing decision, it would be stupid to have "another" modern/future shooter as it won't stand out from the rest and as shown by the majority here, myself included, people are bored sick of modern warfare shooters now.
For marketing and sales purposes, it make the most sense to be WW 1 or 2 era, as if people want a AAA modern warfare or future shooter game, they can choose from countless COD titles, titanfall, battlefront, planetside 2 and even the other current BF games (BF 3, 4 and hardline) for that "fix" but... if people want a WW style shooter, what AAA game is there for them to choose from? Afaik, none so DICE/EA will have that market demographic all to themselves as people have nowhere else to go, which = lots of money.
Personally I think a future style shooter could be done quite well though, just because it is set in the future doesn't mean you need to have jet packs, lock on bullets etc.
As a BF player since BF2, I would take a gritty WW2 ( I don't think WW1 would have the depth to be suitable as well as slow paced) Next to that Vietnam but if its BF 2143 I think it would be awesome.